This study assessed quality of life (QOL) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of 203 adolescents with cerebral palsy (111 males, 92 females; mean age 16y [SD 1y 9mo]). Participants were classified using the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), as Level I (n=60), Level II (n=33), Level III (n=28), Level IV (n=50), or Level V (n=32). QOL was assessed by self (66.5%) or by proxy (33.5%) with the Quality of Life Instrument for People With Developmental Disabilities, which asks about the importance and satisfaction associated with the QOL domains of Being, Belonging, and Becoming; HRQOL was captured through proxy reports with the Health Utilities Index, Mark 3 (HUI3), which characterizes health in terms of eight attributes, each having five or six ordered levels of function. GMFCS level was not a source of variation for QOL domain scores but was significantly associated with the eight HRQOL attributes and overall HUI3 utility scores (p<0.05). Some QOL domain scores varied significantly by type of respondent (self vs proxy; p<0.05). Overall HUI3 utility values were significantly but weakly correlated with QOL Instrument scores for Being (r=0.37), Belonging (r=0.17), Becoming (r=0.20), and Overall QOL (r=0.28), and thus explain up to 14% of the variance (r 2 ). These findings suggest that although QOL and HRQOL are somewhat related conceptually, they are different constructs and need to be considered as separate dimensions of the lives of people with functional limitations.Important aspects of life for individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) include social participation and having meaning and purpose in life. During the past decade there has been a growing interest in concepts and measures associated with quality of life (QOL). Discussion continues about the meaning of various constructs of QOL, 1 as people work to describe the important conceptual variations among terms such as functional status, health status, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Livingston et al. 2 have reviewed the literature that reports various aspects of well-being among adolescents with CP. They concluded that measurement of QOL and HRQOL poses methodological challenges and observed that emphasis has traditionally been on functional or health status rather than personal perspectives of well-being.In brief, 'functional status' refers to 'the degree to which an individual is able to perform socially allocated roles free of physical or mental limitations'; 3 it focuses on the performance of specific tasks, such as activities of daily living. When people refer to 'health status' they generally consider broader medical and functional well-being, sometimes reported in terms of 'impact of disability'. 4 Assessments of QOL and HRQOL shift the emphasis on well-being to the realm of the subjective, toward outcomes not directly observable by a third party and not usually measured along a physical dimension. 5 Although the area of health or function measured in QOL and HRQOL may be either objective or subjective (such as the abil...