2020
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.6577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Are the Effects of Different Abutment Morphologies on Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Behavior? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the type of prostheses, there are disagreements concerning the different behavior between single-implant prostheses and multiple retained prostheses supported by dental implants [ 12 , 13 ]. Nevertheless, the present study revealed significant differences between the type of prostheses for mPI values of 2 and 3 and demonstrated that the ABL was lower in the presence of ISSC than ISFPD and ISFD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the type of prostheses, there are disagreements concerning the different behavior between single-implant prostheses and multiple retained prostheses supported by dental implants [ 12 , 13 ]. Nevertheless, the present study revealed significant differences between the type of prostheses for mPI values of 2 and 3 and demonstrated that the ABL was lower in the presence of ISSC than ISFPD and ISFD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of the type of implant-supported prostheses on peri-implant bone loss and peri-implantitis remains unclear [ 12 , 13 ]. There is also a need for a deeper understanding of the role of prosthetic-related local factors, contributing to the development of peri-implant bone loss [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of limitations have been attributed for this finding, including strong heterogeneity, a very limited sample size, and a small number of included studies. Furthermore, palatal positioning of the implants in the aesthetic zone reduced the effect of abutment morphology on soft tissue thickness 39 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor that affects peri-implant bone conditions is abutment morphology [ 68 , 69 ]. Furthermore, specific abutment surface characteristics (anodization) seem to be associated with a better soft-tissue outcome (greater height of keratinized mucosa) [ 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%