What are you doing? How active and observational experience shape infants' action understanding

Abstract

From early in life, infants watch other people's actions. How do young infants come to make sense of actions they observe? Here, we review empirical findings on the development of action understanding in infancy. Based on this review, we argue that active action experience is crucial for infants' developing action understanding. When infants execute actions, they form associations between motor acts and the sensory consequences of these acts. When infants subsequently observe these actions in others, they can use their motor system to predict the outcome of the ongoing actions. Also, infants come to an understanding of others' actions through the repeated observation of actions and the effects associated with them. In their daily lives, infants have plenty of opportunities to form associations between observed events and learn about statistical regularities of others' behaviours. We argue that based on these two forms of experience-active action experience and observational experience-infants gradually develop more complex action understanding capabilities.

The motor way: Clinical implications of understanding and shaping actions with the motor system in autism and drug addiction

“…Considering that 14-to 16-month-old infants have well-established first-person experience with crawling but limited experience with walking, such data support the hypothesis presented above, that motor resonance may be modulated by first-person motor experience (van Elk, van Schie, Hunnius, Vesper, & Bekkering, 2008). A number of behavioral, electrophysiological, and brain-imaging studies converge on this interpretation (Calvo-Merino, Grèzes, Glaser, Passingham, & Haggard, 2006;Cross, Hamilton, & Grafton, 2006;Kanakogi & Itakura, 2011;Turati et al, 2013; for a review, see Hunnius & Bekkering, 2014).…”

Mirror neuron research: the past and the future

“…We gave ample space in this special issue to this topic [18][19][20][21][22]. It is highly debated whether the mirror system arose as the consequence of association learning or an evolutionary process that endowed a population of neurons with a mechanism necessary for accomplishing a specific function [20,23].…”

The biocultural emergence of mindreading: integrating cognitive archaeology and human development

“…First, through experience as actors, infants come to understand the world they experience in terms of potential actions. Thus, learning to perform novel actions should improve infants' capacity to predict the outcome of observed actions (Hunnius and Bekkering 2014;Meltzoff 2007;Woodward 2013). As evidence for this, several studies showed that infants' sensitivity to the target-directedness of an action correlates with their capacity to perform the very same action (Brand et al 2015;, and improves together with it .…”