2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-017-9418-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What College Instructors Can Do About Student Cyber-slacking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Distractive smartphone use was measured by asking participants to rate how frequent they engage in nine types of smartphone activities in learning settings. A raw score of distractive smartphone use was calculated for each participant by averaging across the nine items and higher scores meaning higher extent of distractive smartphone use in learning settings (Flanigan & Kiewra, 2018). Educational smartphone use was measured by asking participants to rate how frequent they engage in three types of smartphone activities in learning settings (e.g., lectures, homework, and so forth).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distractive smartphone use was measured by asking participants to rate how frequent they engage in nine types of smartphone activities in learning settings. A raw score of distractive smartphone use was calculated for each participant by averaging across the nine items and higher scores meaning higher extent of distractive smartphone use in learning settings (Flanigan & Kiewra, 2018). Educational smartphone use was measured by asking participants to rate how frequent they engage in three types of smartphone activities in learning settings (e.g., lectures, homework, and so forth).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, attempts at crafting suitable cell phone policies appear to resort to more drastic and punitive measures. For example, many of the recommendations to curb cyber-slacking, as outlined by Flanigan and Kiewra (2018), appear to adopt a more zero tolerance to use of mobile devices in a class setting.…”
Section: Mobile Cell Phone Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) In terms of the implementation of an appropriate mobile phone policy for the use on campus, university administrators and lecturers could consider adopting the softer strategies as espoused by Flanigan and Kiewra (2018) as against the harsher policies of strict enforcement and bans. As suggested, measures which include incorporating mobile phone as a teaching tool, providing incentives which foster an active learning JRIT&L atmosphere, and to encourage students' motivation to self-regulate compulsive use during class are preferred options for Caribbean institutions.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, smartphone usage in university classrooms can inevitably lead to distraction—such as checking emails, sending text messages, or using social media during class for off-task purposes. Studies indicate anywhere from 81% to 90% of students report using their phone at least once per lecture for off-task purposes (Berry & Westfall, 2015; Flanigan & Kiewra, 2018). Literature and empirical experience indicate unstructured in-classroom cell phone use could result in negative educational outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature and empirical experience indicate unstructured in-classroom cell phone use could result in negative educational outcomes. Students who use cell phones for off-task purposes seem to take notes in class less frequently, earn lower test scores, and lower experience grades overall (Flanigan & Kiewra, 2018). Ultimately, off-task smartphone use is thought to negatively impact student engagement by creating a cycle of progressive failure, disengagement, and discouragement (Langmia & Glass, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%