2016
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What could you do with 400 years of biological history on african americans? Evaluating the potential scientific benefit of systematic studies of dental and skeletal materials on African Americans from the 17th through 20th centuries

Abstract: ObjectivesHow important is it to be able to reconstruct the lives of a highly diverse, historically recent macroethnic group over the course of 400 years? How many insights into human evolutionary biology and disease susceptibilities could be gained, even with this relatively recent window into the past? In this article, we explore the potential ramifications of a newly constructed dataset of Four Centuries of African American Biological Variation (4Cs).MethodsThis article provides initial lists of digitized v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like all research involving personally identifying or relatedness information, human genealogical dental research is subject to regulations outlined by approving ethics panels or institutional review boards (Gert et al, 1997; Turner et al, 2018). Researchers must carefully consider the collection, anonymization, use, storage, and sharing of pedigree information (see Jackson et al, 2016; Wylie & Mineau, 2003). Generally, once data are anonymized (i.e., personally identifying information removed), little risk is posed to participants of a family study.…”
Section: Where Do We Go From Here?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like all research involving personally identifying or relatedness information, human genealogical dental research is subject to regulations outlined by approving ethics panels or institutional review boards (Gert et al, 1997; Turner et al, 2018). Researchers must carefully consider the collection, anonymization, use, storage, and sharing of pedigree information (see Jackson et al, 2016; Wylie & Mineau, 2003). Generally, once data are anonymized (i.e., personally identifying information removed), little risk is posed to participants of a family study.…”
Section: Where Do We Go From Here?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike many other forensic laboratories, the research conducted on the Cobb Collection individuals emphasizes gaining more insights into the lives of African Americans and looking into the impact of race/ethnicity has had on the health of an individual. The research on the Cobb Collection has contributed to dispelling preconceived biases about African Americans as being physically and/or mentally inferior in comparison to other groups and has allowed for the emergence of an authentic, comprehensive consideration of the historical context of African American health [7].…”
Section: The Cobb Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a piece by Jackson et al. () concludes that the newly constructed “Four Centuries of African American Biological Variation (4Cs)” dataset could be a useful tool in better understanding the mental and physical health of a community that has yet to receive the “big data” treatment. There seems to be more space and an increased willingness to both strive for the replicability and rigor of scientific practice while understanding that research in anthropology, as a humanistic social science, can address gaps in the literature that result from error or lack of attention toward marginalized populations.…”
Section: The Biocultural Dilemma: Becoming Intentionally Integrative mentioning
confidence: 99%