2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2005.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What distinguishes malaria parasites from other pigmented haemosporidians?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(hereafter referred to as avian malaria, but see Valkiunas et al 2005) and investigate the consequences of infection for individual survival. We therefore combine parasite prevalence data with the long-term life-history dataset from this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(hereafter referred to as avian malaria, but see Valkiunas et al 2005) and investigate the consequences of infection for individual survival. We therefore combine parasite prevalence data with the long-term life-history dataset from this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species identification and systematics in general is a profound problem in avian haemosporidia, particularly within the genus Plasmodium , which is partly reflected by the ongoing debate on the use of the term 'malaria parasite' (Pé rez-Tris et al 2005;Valki" unas et al 2005). Classical systematics, which is based on conventional, mainly morphological criteria, distinguishes four Plasmodium subgenera (Corradetti et al 1963).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is limited host specificity on the vector-side, i.e. in the culicid mosquitoes, ceratopogonid midges, simuliid and hippoboscid flies (Olsen 1974;Rathore et al 2001;Valki" unas 2005) transmitting the various parasite genera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No major attempts have been made at taxonomic revision in the era of molecular systematics. Where debate has occurred, it has concerned the more esoteric question of what constitutes a malaria parasite (14,16); however, because the genera within the opposing nomenclatural models do not themselves constitute monophyletic groupings, those interpretations are inherently flawed as well.…”
Section: Malaria Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%