2006
DOI: 10.1198/016214506000000636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Do Randomized Studies of Housing Mobility Demonstrate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
428
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 422 publications
(432 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
428
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To address the well-known problem of self-selection, randomized control studies are commonly thought of as the "gold standard". However, neighborhood social experiments are also subject to limitations in the dose and length of intervention and issues such as randomization and substitution bias and "interference" which may also undermine causal inferences (Sorensen et al, 1998;Heckman and Smith, 1995;Sobel, 2006;Rubin, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the well-known problem of self-selection, randomized control studies are commonly thought of as the "gold standard". However, neighborhood social experiments are also subject to limitations in the dose and length of intervention and issues such as randomization and substitution bias and "interference" which may also undermine causal inferences (Sorensen et al, 1998;Heckman and Smith, 1995;Sobel, 2006;Rubin, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also sometimes referred to as the assumption of "no spillover." Some recent work has discussed relaxing this SUTVA assumption, in the context of school effects (Hong & Raudenbush, 2006) or neighborhood effects (Sobel, 2006).…”
Section: Notation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What this pattern makes clear is that the traditional literature on stratification, which focuses 3 Evidence on whether neighborhoods influence individual behavioral outcomes varies depending on the outcome being examined and the methods used. There are important problems with all approaches that have been used to study neighborhood effects, including the most recent experimental attempt to assess the effects of residential mobility on individual outcomes (for a description of the Moving to Opportunity program, see Goering and Feins [2003]; for a recent critique of the program, see Sobel [2006]). The following sources provide reviews of the neighborhood effects literature: Brooks-Gunn et al 1993;Ellen and Turner 2003;Jencks and Mayer 1990;Sampson et al 2002;Small and Newman 2001. primarily on income, occupation, and education, is not sufficient for describing the stratification of place.…”
Section: The Neighborhood As a Dimension Of Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%