2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do we know about buyer–seller negotiations in marketing research? A status quo analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This decision is embedded in ongoing negotiations with one or multiple potential suppliers (Herbst, Voeth et al 2011, Thomas, Thomas et al 2013 in which information continues to be gathered and analyzed to inform decisions. Negotiations also pose a potential source of mutual insight into differences in needs and opportunities to capture additional value (Reid, Pullins et al 2002, Olekalns andSmith 2013).…”
Section: Negotiation and Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This decision is embedded in ongoing negotiations with one or multiple potential suppliers (Herbst, Voeth et al 2011, Thomas, Thomas et al 2013 in which information continues to be gathered and analyzed to inform decisions. Negotiations also pose a potential source of mutual insight into differences in needs and opportunities to capture additional value (Reid, Pullins et al 2002, Olekalns andSmith 2013).…”
Section: Negotiation and Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(E) Adoption of VBPS implicates the existence of mediationoriented activities aimed at turning mutual understanding of needs and capabilities into mutually valuable agreements. Specific procurement situation (Johnston and Lewin 1996), Specification (Cavinato 1992), Communication (Carr and Smeltzer 1999, Prahinski and Benton 2004, Paulraj, Lado et al 2008), Negotiation (Herbst, Voeth et al 2011, Thomas, Thomas et al 2013, Contracts (Talluri and Lee 2010, Caldwell and Howard 2014, Li, Ryan et al 2015, Chen, Dada et al 2017, Evaluation (Humphreys, Mak et al 1998), Logistics Halldorsson 2004, Rodrigue 2012), Ordering (Cardozo 1983),…”
Section: Internal Representation Of the Procurement Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This "mental and behavioral software" of individuals has been studied in biology, brain science, and psychology (Goleman, 2006a(Goleman, , 2006bGrawe, 2004;Peters & Ghadiri, 2011), but these findings have been more or less neglected in international business research. And yet, dyadic human interaction, such as buyer-seller negotiations and opportunity development, are crucial IB encounters (e.g., Bush & Ingram, 1996, 2001Herbig & Kramer, 1992;Herbst, Voeth, & Meister, 2011;Johnson, Lenartowicz, & Apud, 2006;Muzychenko, 2008). An encounter refers here to an episode of intercultural interaction in which two persons face each other in a businessrelated situation that constitutes part of a relationship-building process.…”
Section: Motivation For the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intercultural encounters have been extensively studied, particularly from the viewpoint of antecedents, influencing variables, and the interrelationships between influencing variables (cf. Bloemer, Pluymaekers, & Odekerken, 2013;Herbst et al, 2011). Intercultural competences, 1 that is, abilities to interact effectively and appropriately in intercultural encounters (Deardorff, 2006), are considered one of the keys for enabling the development of dyadic business relations (cf.…”
Section: Motivation For the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%