What drives relocation policies in the Maldives?

Abstract

The predominant responses to rising sea levels are in situ adaptations. However, increasing rates of sea-level rise will render ex situ adaptations—in the form of relocations—inevitable in some low-lying coastal zones. Particularly small island states like the Maldives face this significant adaptation challenge. Here, government action is necessary to move vulnerable communities out of flood-prone areas. Yet, little empirical knowledge exists about the governance of relocations. While the literature often highlights risks and benefits of relocations, it remains unclear how governments organized relocations and what drove relocation policy. Therefore, we examined Maldivian relocation policies from 1968 to 2018 to explain government support of relocations. For this, we used a qualitative research design and extended the multiple streams approach with the theoretical lens of historical institutionalism. To gather data, we conducted semi-structured interviews (n = 23) with relocation policy experts and locals affected by relocations. Interview data was complemented with a desk review of relevant laws, historical records, and policy documents. We find 29 completed and 25 failed cases of relocations in the 50-year period. Key drivers of relocation policies are focusing events, socioeconomic development, and institutionalized island autonomy. We find that relocations were predominantly initiated as means to facilitate economic development, not as a response to rising seas or coastal risk. With current rapid economic development and strengthened democratic institutions, relocations are not considered as a policy option anymore. We conclude that implementing relocations proactively will face significant barriers in the future, which highlights the urgency of successful in situ adaptations in the Maldives.

Environmental migration as short‐ or long‐term differences from a trend: A case study of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita effects on out‐migration in the Gulf of Mexico

“…Substantively, the novel finding of this study is that after the disaster residents' out‐migration probabilities remain elevated for several years. While the reasons for this enduring shift are not revealed by this study, more studies of post‐disaster migration decision‐making are warranted (Bardsley & Hugo, 2010; Gussmann & Hinkel, 2020; Rhodes & Besbris, 2022; Schwaller & BenDor, 2021; Yamamoto & Esteban, 2017). Furthermore, it suggests that federal and state government disaster recovery policies that incentivize residents to move out of harms' way may become more appealing in areas that have suffered repeated losses or are highly exposed to hazards (U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2020; Siders, 2019).…”

Managed retreat and planned retreat: a systematic literature review

“…Thaler & Fuchs [88] also published an analysis that explored the connections between financial aid and recovery with pre- and post-relocation. Recognition that the motivations for needing managed retreat policy and programmes are often economic is also observed [100,110,122].…”

Considering socio-political framings when analyzing coastal climate change effects can prevent maldevelopment on small islands

“…These "anthropogenic tipping points" 22 are mainly governed by negative socio-political dynamics, which have grown historically in the Maldivian context within the last decades 26,37 . Despite the success of recent decentralization efforts 38 , national development policies aim at improving the socio-economic situation by fostering regional development centers (see the National Population Consolidation Program). These regional development centers are equipped with public and infrastructure facilities, and thus are considered safer and are higher populated 26,37 .…”