2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What drives students’ intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
66
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have revealed that social influence does not affect student attitude towards computers and the use of other devices because society's overall positive views cancel the effect of these forms of social influence [78,79]. However, Zheng and Li [80] demonstrated that in student acceptance of computers and the use of other devices, FS was a significant predictor of usefulness and ease of use. Overall, as students stayed at home and followed online courses during the pandemic, this study reasonably assumed that supporting students in their use of computers in online learning induced a positive effect on the students' perceived usefulness and ease of use of online learning.…”
Section: H5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have revealed that social influence does not affect student attitude towards computers and the use of other devices because society's overall positive views cancel the effect of these forms of social influence [78,79]. However, Zheng and Li [80] demonstrated that in student acceptance of computers and the use of other devices, FS was a significant predictor of usefulness and ease of use. Overall, as students stayed at home and followed online courses during the pandemic, this study reasonably assumed that supporting students in their use of computers in online learning induced a positive effect on the students' perceived usefulness and ease of use of online learning.…”
Section: H5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies have reinforced that PEU is a good predictor for perceived usefulness (Veloo & Masood, 2014;Elkaseh, Wong, & Fung, 2016;Zheng & Li, 2020). Prior experience and computer self-efficacy were found to positively influence PEU (Lee et al, 2013), while computer self-efficacy positively influences PEU, where PEU has a positive significant relationship towards behavioural intention (Hsia, Chang, & Tseng, 2014).…”
Section: Perceived Ease Of Use (Peu)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As SCT is commonly used in studies involving learning, knowledge management, human resource development, and career development (Kim & Park, 2018) and TAM is fundamental in exploring determinants of information technology usage (Choudhury & Pattniak, 2020;Zheng & Li, 2020), integrating these theories is appropriate to investigating behavioural intention to use e-learning. This study adopted computer self-efficacy and prior experience from SCT as well as perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use from TAM to form an integrated research model.…”
Section: Supporting Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations