2007
DOI: 10.1080/10447310709336964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Frustrates Screen Reader Users on the Web: A Study of 100 Blind Users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
141
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
141
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, if one of the emitters is not able to write quickly and if there are not ways to establish the turn to write, he could have problems to follow the rhythm of the conversation [7] [8]. Besides, screen reader users face other specific problems related to the web page's auto-refresh or updated content because it causes the restart of the screen reader [3]; the use of keyboard traps [4]; or the lack of support for text-to-speech or text-to-braille functions [5].…”
Section: Accessibility Barriers Of Chatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, if one of the emitters is not able to write quickly and if there are not ways to establish the turn to write, he could have problems to follow the rhythm of the conversation [7] [8]. Besides, screen reader users face other specific problems related to the web page's auto-refresh or updated content because it causes the restart of the screen reader [3]; the use of keyboard traps [4]; or the lack of support for text-to-speech or text-to-braille functions [5].…”
Section: Accessibility Barriers Of Chatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, chats are not accessible for everybody [1]. For instance, screen reader users face accessibility barriers related to updated content without advising [2] and keyboard traps [3]. Furthermore, chats in MDs present additional accessibility barriers [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…propriate link text, mouse specific navigation structures also constitute navigation difficulties as pointed out by [20,19]. Appropriate examples from popular websites are chosen to portray navigation difficulties in the sections below.…”
Section: Complicated Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have examined website conformance to WCAG 1.0 guidelines (see Table 1). Lazar et al (2010) Websites from four European Union states Marincu and McMullin (2004) Nepal government websites Shah and Shakya (2007) Brazilian municipalities websites Freire, Bittar, and Fortes (2008) State legislative websites in the USA Fagen and Fagen (2004) University websites in the USA Bradbard, Peters, and Caneva (2010); Krach (2007) International university websites Kane, Shulman, Shockley, and Ladner (2007) Study about website quality, which focused on blind users Lazar, Allen, Kleinnman, and Malarkey (2007) Determined the accessibility levels over time of several websites arbitrarily chosen Lazar and Greenidge (2006) Spanish and North American university libraries Caballero, Faba, and De Moya (2009) Suggested some straightforward assessment models for the "cybermedia" Rodríguez, Codina, and Pedraza (2010) Revised the recommendations regarding credibility assessment and online information accessibility…”
Section: Critical Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%