2019
DOI: 10.1017/cls.2019.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Habeas Corpus Can (and Cannot) Do for Immigration Detainees: Scotland v Canada and the Injustices of Imprisoning Migrants

Abstract: This paper closely studies Scotland v Canada to reveal the normative and substantive justice challenges facing immigration detainees across Canada. The Scotland decision at the Ontario Superior Court certified a habeas corpus writ as an individual remedy to release Mr. Ricardo Scotland from a pointless, seventeen-month incarceration. The decision frames Mr. Scotland’s detention as anomalous or divergent from an otherwise-functioning system. Against this view, this paper argues that access to habeas corpus cann… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An intersectional lens on the sliding doors scenarios reveals how migrants and refugees experience racial violence, particularly anti-Black racism, on top of immigrant injustice and the violence of detention. Raced, classed, gendered, ableist, neoliberal, and post/neo-colonial biases construct legal and policy categories of "illegal, " "inadmissible, " and "criminal" people, creating barriers to equality for migrants and for citizens (see, e.g., Chan 2005;Clutterbuck 2015;Fernando and Rinaldi 2017;Goldring et al 2009;Sharma 2001;Silverman 2019;Silverman and Kaytaz 2020;Tam 2017). Tryon Woods (2013 reminds us that anti-Black paradigms ("prostitution, human traffi cking, international drug trade, or even feminist analyses of the larger historical context of globalization") continue to delimit South-to-North migrants into either victims or perpetrators, thereby injuring them in countless ways before they arrive at a prison or detention center.…”
Section: Slidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intersectional lens on the sliding doors scenarios reveals how migrants and refugees experience racial violence, particularly anti-Black racism, on top of immigrant injustice and the violence of detention. Raced, classed, gendered, ableist, neoliberal, and post/neo-colonial biases construct legal and policy categories of "illegal, " "inadmissible, " and "criminal" people, creating barriers to equality for migrants and for citizens (see, e.g., Chan 2005;Clutterbuck 2015;Fernando and Rinaldi 2017;Goldring et al 2009;Sharma 2001;Silverman 2019;Silverman and Kaytaz 2020;Tam 2017). Tryon Woods (2013 reminds us that anti-Black paradigms ("prostitution, human traffi cking, international drug trade, or even feminist analyses of the larger historical context of globalization") continue to delimit South-to-North migrants into either victims or perpetrators, thereby injuring them in countless ways before they arrive at a prison or detention center.…”
Section: Slidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sans être une panacée (Silverman, 2019), il s'agit d'une bonne nouvelle pour les personnes qui veulent limiter le recours à la détention car l'arrêt permet de recourir à une protection contre la détention abusive plus généralement associée au système de justice pénale.…”
Section: Criminalisation Procédurale : Détention D'immigrationunclassified