What happens to patient experience when you want to see a doctor and you get to speak to a nurse? Observational study using data from the English General Practice Patient Survey

Abstract

ObjectivesTo examine patient consultation preferences for seeing or speaking to a general practitioner (GP) or nurse; to estimate associations between patient-reported experiences and the type of consultation patients actually received (phone or face-to-face, GP or nurse).DesignSecondary analysis of data from the 2013 to 2014 General Practice Patient Survey.Setting and participants870 085 patients from 8005 English general practices.OutcomesPatient ratings of communication and ‘trust and confidence’ with the clinician they saw.Results77.7% of patients reported wanting to see or speak to a GP, while 14.5% reported asking to see or speak to a nurse the last time they tried to make an appointment (weighted percentages). Being unable to see or speak to the practitioner type of the patients’ choice was associated with lower ratings of trust and confidence and patient-rated communication. Smaller differences were found if patients wanted a face-to-face consultation and received a phone consultation instead. The greatest difference was for patients who asked to see a GP and instead spoke to a nurse for whom the adjusted mean difference in confidence and trust compared with those who wanted to see a nurse and did see a nurse was −15.8 points (95% CI −17.6 to −14.0) for confidence and trust in the practitioner and −10.5 points (95% CI −11.7 to −9.3) for net communication score, both on a 0–100 scale.ConclusionsPatients’ evaluation of their care is worse if they do not receive the type of consultation they expect, especially if they prefer a doctor but are unable to see one. New models of care should consider the potential unintended consequences for patient experience of the widespread introduction of multidisciplinary teams in general practice.

Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three ‘new’ non-medical roles in English primary care

“…Longer-term economic impact studies of new roles are required, including whether role changes are meeting patients’ needs,41 and identifying the optimal skill mix appropriate to organisational goals in different contexts. The financial cost of employing new role professionals against evidence of their value and contribution in general practice needs to be considered, since the very initiatives aimed at alleviating pressure may paradoxically place increased strain on staff, at least initially, and mean that GPs incur extra workload in supervision or mentoring.…”

Patient experiences with outpatient care in Hungary: results of an online population survey

“…Our results also stressed that the respondents have reported much better care experiences with doctors than with allied health professionals (e.g., nursing professionals), which is aligned with another study [ 29 ]. Albeit nurses affect only some dimensions of patient experience [ 36 ], one may report worse experiences if one does not receive the type of consultation expected (e.g., talk to a nurse instead of a GP) [ 37 ]. Our findings suggest that the respondents have a clear preference to be seen by a doctor, regardless of the type of care needed.…”

Predictive factors of the general public’s willingness to be seen and seek treatment from a nurse practitioner in Australia: a cross-sectional national survey

“…Internationally and in Australia, health service providers are reconceptualising how health care is delivered through adjunct, autonomous models of care, delivered by health professionals who work independently to manage caseloads and who are not a medical doctor [ 9 , 14 , 21 , 24 ]. Patient reported outcome measures such as patient experience and satisfaction are fundamental measure of quality health care [ 25 ].…”