2019
DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.19.13267-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What have we learned from network meta-analyses applied to critical care?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smoking cessation effect of different interventions was estimated based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). The SUCRA value ranges from 0 to 100%, where a SUCRA value of 100% indicates that the treatment was the most effective, and the smaller the value, the poorer the treatment effect [24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smoking cessation effect of different interventions was estimated based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). The SUCRA value ranges from 0 to 100%, where a SUCRA value of 100% indicates that the treatment was the most effective, and the smaller the value, the poorer the treatment effect [24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a statistical tool that allows the analysis of the simultaneous comparison between interventions from different studies. In addition, it enables sorting all interventions according to their probability of being the best, even when they have never been compared in a face to face study [ 15 ]. Recently, NMAs have been applied to several diseases and their conclusions have been considered in recognized CPGs to increase the level of recommendations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%