What Is Rational and Irrational in Human Decision Making

Abstract

There has been a growing trend to develop cognitive models based on the mathematics of quantum theory. A common theme in the motivation of such models has been findings which apparently challenge the applicability of classical formalisms, specifically ones based on classical probability theory. Classical probability theory has had a singularly important place in cognitive theory, because of its (in general) descriptive success but, more importantly, because in decision situations with low, equivalent stakes it offers a multiply justified normative standard. Quantum cognitive models have had a degree of descriptive success and proponents of such models have argued that they reveal new intuitions or insights regarding decisions in uncertain situations. However, can quantum cognitive models further benefit from normative justifications analogous to those for classical probability models? If the answer is yes, how can we determine the rational status of a decision, which may be consistent with quantum theory, but inconsistent with classical probability theory? In this paper, we review the proposal from Pothos, Busemeyer, Shiffrin, and Yearsley (2017), that quantum decision models benefit from normative justification based on the Dutch Book Theorem, in exactly the same way as models based on classical probability theory.

Novel Data Science Approach for Emotion Analytics: from Machine Learning to Quantum Cognition

“…Quantum logic is a generalized Boolean logic that lacks many of the constraints of Boolean logic, has more flexibility and unpredictability, and is more suited to understanding human judgments and decisions [35]. Quantum cognitive decision theory has produced several advancements in human cognition during the last ten years, and it has been recognized as a new technique to investigate human cognitive science [32].…”

Temporal Evolution of Trust in Artificial Intelligence-Supported Decision-Making

“…One of the leading efforts for higher decision quality is building models and testing the models of human cognitive systems. Commonly, these models are probabilistic and coherently tested with the axioms of CPT (Pothos et al, 2021). The shortfalls of the CPT based models in capturing cognitive phenomenon have initiated a new line of inquiry on the applicability of using QPT (Busemeyer & Bruza, 2014).…”

Natural disaster management in Korea: Is it the “best”, or is it just “satisfactory”?

“…Cognitive constraints or emotional conflicts among stakeholders in the field of natural disaster management may result in their limited rationality. In short, the behaviour of human beings is not always rational, and human behaviour in natural disaster management often becomes irrational (Pothos et al 2021;Simon 2000).…”

“…In short, the behaviour of human beings is not always rational, and human behaviour in natural disaster management often becomes irrational (Pothos et al. 2021; Simon 2000).…”