2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4496-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the impact of stromal microinvasion on oncologic outcomes in borderline ovarian tumors? A multicenter case–control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, there is controversy on the relevance of microinvasion to recurrence, which is defined as the presence of infiltration to stroma less than 3 mm in the longest linear dimension or ≤ 10 mm 2 in one or more points (14,23). Boyraz et al demonstrated the relevance of microinvasion to decreasing disease-free survival (13). In our study, none of the histological factors including micropapillary, microinvasion, and noninvasive peritoneal implants significantly affected the recurrence, but it was with a shorter recurrence interval in micropapillary histology (110 months vs. 117 months).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, there is controversy on the relevance of microinvasion to recurrence, which is defined as the presence of infiltration to stroma less than 3 mm in the longest linear dimension or ≤ 10 mm 2 in one or more points (14,23). Boyraz et al demonstrated the relevance of microinvasion to decreasing disease-free survival (13). In our study, none of the histological factors including micropapillary, microinvasion, and noninvasive peritoneal implants significantly affected the recurrence, but it was with a shorter recurrence interval in micropapillary histology (110 months vs. 117 months).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some factors influence the recurrence development including advanced maternal age, CA125 level, and invasive implantations (3). It should be mentioned that it is controversial to attribute the prognosis and recurrence rate to the pres-ence of micro-papillary and microinvasion patterns (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with microinvasive BOT had a significantly higher rate of recurrence than patients without microinvasive BOT (17.4 vs. 7.8%, OR 3.55, 95% CI 1.091–11.59, p = 0.03) . In particular stromal microinvasion was found as a prognostic factor for significantly shorter disease free survival (26.7 vs. 11.9 months, p = 0.031) ( 73 ).…”
Section: Disease Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%