1989
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(89)90429-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the relationship between the endothelium derived relaxant factor and nitric oxide?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that hindquarters vasodilator responses to acetylcholine (this paper) and to endothelin-1 (Kiff et al, 1991) were intact when bradykinin-mediated responses were impaired in STZ-treated rats is consistent with the relative resistance of the former responses to inhibition by L-NAME (Gardiner et al, 1990b). Elsewhere (Gardiner et al, 1990b) we have discussed the possibility that this is due to release of nitric oxide from a pre-formed pool and/or the involvement of nitric oxide-independent mechanisms (Aisaka et al, 1989;Long & Berkowitz, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The finding that hindquarters vasodilator responses to acetylcholine (this paper) and to endothelin-1 (Kiff et al, 1991) were intact when bradykinin-mediated responses were impaired in STZ-treated rats is consistent with the relative resistance of the former responses to inhibition by L-NAME (Gardiner et al, 1990b). Elsewhere (Gardiner et al, 1990b) we have discussed the possibility that this is due to release of nitric oxide from a pre-formed pool and/or the involvement of nitric oxide-independent mechanisms (Aisaka et al, 1989;Long & Berkowitz, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…While these results indicate a component of the control response to acetylcholine was probably due to nitric oxidemediated mechanisms, substantial responses remained under these conditions, and, in particular, the hindquarters vasodilator response was not different from normal. There are several possible explanations for these findings, including: (1) the responses were due to a mechanism not involving nitric oxide (see Long & Berkowitz, 1989); (2) the responses were due to release of nitric oxide from a preformed pool (see Aisaka et al, 1989); (3) the responses were due to nitric oxide, but relatively unaffected by L-NAME due to efficient receptor-effector coupling (Giles et al, 1990). Considering this last possibility we have carried out preliminary experiments to assess the effect of atropine on the sensitivity of acetylcholine-induced vasodilator responses to L-NAME (Giles et al, 1990).…”
Section: Responses To Acetylcholinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endothelial cells, however, were NADPH-dpositive and could suggest the presence of NO. The vasodilator role of NO in endothelial cells is well known through its inhibitory action on vascular smooth muscle (Ignarro et al 1987;Amezcua et al 1988;Long and Berkowitz 1989). NO-mediated vasodilation not only could occur in endothelial cells, but also through nitrergic nerves acting directly on smooth muscle cells (Burnett et al 1992;Kummer et al 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%