2006
DOI: 10.1177/0959354306060105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Kind of Theory is Activity Theory?

Abstract: The theoretical, research and practice perspective known variously as activity theory, the cultural-historical theory of activity, CHAT (cultural historical activity theory), socio-cultural psychology and cultural historical psychology has evolved bodies of literature in diverse areas, most notably developmental, educational and organizational psychology; psychotherapy; cognitive science; curriculum and teaching; literacy, writing and rhetoric; information technology and design; and geography. Theoretically, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They are an explicit and novel framing device to understand impact evaluations as activities distributed over time. Development, for Vygotsky, contrasts with the “accepted scientific paradigm” in which a scientific method is understood as a tool to yield representational results (Holzman, : 112). Vygotsky saw scientific work not as separate methods and results, or isolated inputs and outputs, but as broader development and change over time in unfolding practice, which becomes “simultaneously prerequisite and product, the tool and the result” (Holzman, ; Vygotsky, : 65).…”
Section: Methodological Framework and Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are an explicit and novel framing device to understand impact evaluations as activities distributed over time. Development, for Vygotsky, contrasts with the “accepted scientific paradigm” in which a scientific method is understood as a tool to yield representational results (Holzman, : 112). Vygotsky saw scientific work not as separate methods and results, or isolated inputs and outputs, but as broader development and change over time in unfolding practice, which becomes “simultaneously prerequisite and product, the tool and the result” (Holzman, ; Vygotsky, : 65).…”
Section: Methodological Framework and Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development, for Vygotsky, contrasts with the “accepted scientific paradigm” in which a scientific method is understood as a tool to yield representational results (Holzman, : 112). Vygotsky saw scientific work not as separate methods and results, or isolated inputs and outputs, but as broader development and change over time in unfolding practice, which becomes “simultaneously prerequisite and product, the tool and the result” (Holzman, ; Vygotsky, : 65). To understand evaluations in practice then (not as inputs/outputs nor methods/results), one can draw on Vygotsky and CHAT, to constitute evaluations as developing activity chains.…”
Section: Methodological Framework and Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engestrom (2000) offers a model of activity based on five underpinning principles: that it is viewed as a collective network; it has multi-vocality and historicity, in that many individuals drive it over time; that problems drive progress; and it may evolve into a new form. Although Holzman (2006) argues that there is no consensus over what constitutes activity theory, Sannino, Daniels, and Gutiérrez, (2009) link activity theory to Soviet constructivist psychology, particularly Vygotsky (1978) and Davydov (1996), and the benefits of social learning as an aid to high level thinking. For Engestrom (1999, 29), 'activity theory has the conceptual and methodological potential to be a pathbreaker in studies that help humans gain control over their own artefacts and thus over their future'.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Anon 2002) In the field of study of work activity theoretical approaches has been held last years as a promising theoretical and practical tool. Although there is no unified definition of activity theory (Holzman 2006) notions of agency and of object (Barab & Plucker 2002, Bedny & Harris 2005, Kaptelinin 2005, Leontiev 1977 are hold central in understanding and explaining human activity. In this article I will focus on how veterinarians experience their work, animals and clients applying activity theoretical way of thinking to interpret the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%