37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of The 2004
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2004.1265462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What lurkers and posters think of each other [online community]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
80
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The constrained information channels that restrict knowing your audience have led to innovations in making audience visible [11] and research on the possible benefits of "lurkers" [21]. In previous work [18], users were asked who they thought had seen their Facebook profile, and in general reported their expected audience was comprised of peers (friends, people in classes, high school acquaintances) and was much less likely to include nonpeers (faculty, family, law enforcement).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constrained information channels that restrict knowing your audience have led to innovations in making audience visible [11] and research on the possible benefits of "lurkers" [21]. In previous work [18], users were asked who they thought had seen their Facebook profile, and in general reported their expected audience was comprised of peers (friends, people in classes, high school acquaintances) and was much less likely to include nonpeers (faculty, family, law enforcement).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Nonnecke & Preece (2001) maintain that lurking is an imperative aspect of an online community and should be regarded as a form of passive or vicarious participation that not only serves to increase the understanding in the lurker, but provides a sense of belonging regardless of whether they ever intend to participate. There is also the possibility that active participants in an online community 'perform' to a potential readership that may or may not eventually become active participants in a community.…”
Section: The Bgsb Mba Blogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side lurkers [5], referring to people just watching discussions but not actually participating, can be less trusted regarding their 'openness'. They lack the willingness to exchange information, motivation or communication skills, thus they are bad collaborators.…”
Section: Trust and Roles In Virtual Community Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Nonnecke et al [5] and Meyer et al [6] research the meaning of online communication and differences between traditional face-to face and threaded discussions. McLure-Wasko and Faraj [7] investigate the motivation for knowledge sharing in online platforms, and Rheingold [8] comprehensively examines the concept of virtual communities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%