What Makes a (Third) Wave?

Evans, Elizabeth

doi:10.1080/14616742.2015.1027627

Cited by 24 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Starting from the first wave of feminism which aims to voice women (Kotef, 2009;Sharlach, 2009).Then the second wave was born with a focus on issues that shifted to social and personal (Bunkle, 2016). Then came the third wave that focused on intersectionality (Snyder, 2008;Dean, 2009;Evans, 2015;Aune & Holyoak, 2017). When the second and third waves appeared almost simultaneously, fourth wave feminism was born by tying identity to each wave that was driven by the use of social media (O'Neill, 2015;Zimmerman, 2017).…”

Section: Feminist Critical Discoursementioning

confidence: 99%

Sexual Politics in Fiksimini: Analysis of Feminist Critical Discourse

Sari

Wiyatmi

2021

IJLLT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to describe the sexual politics in fiksimini by using feminist critical discourse analysis. This research is a qualitative descriptive study that uses @fiksimini account during January-February 2020 on Twitter as the data source. The research data used is sexual politics discourse contained in literary worksfiksimini which has a total of 267 data with 44 topicsfiksimini. Data collection techniques are conducted by reading and recorded in the data cards. The data collection instrument was the researcher himself (human instrument) using Kate Millett's sexual politics parameters. Data analysis technique in this study used semantic and pragmatic equivalents in analyzing work fiksimini containing sexual politics in fiksimini. The data analysis stage is carried out by the work step of literature research, namely studying libraries related to research objects by reading, taking notes, and interpreting references related to research objects. The results showed that there are six forms of sexual politics contained in fiksimini, namely: sexual slavery, women's domestic work, control of women, abuse of sexuality, rape, projecting women and negotiations conducted by female characters in the story. Sexual politics contained in fiksimini is 80% written by male writers who recount the power of patriarchy. The ideology seen from writing about sexual politics shows that writers use male and female characters emerging from social classes, institutions of marriage, and free sex. The female characters narrated by the fiksimini writers still place women as inferior beings who are in the power of superior patriarchy.

show abstract

Section: Feminist Critical Discoursementioning

confidence: 99%

Sexual Politics in Fiksimini: Analysis of Feminist Critical Discourse

Sari

Wiyatmi

2021

IJLLT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this debate, intersectionality is a useful consideration. 64 First coined by Crenshaw, inter-sectionality has challenged the traditional belief that discrimination is a single categorical axis. 65 Crenshaw has explained that gender and racial discrimination are mutually reinforcing 66 and intersecting in shape structural and political oppression against women of colour.…”

Section: Specifically On Women Rights: Feminist Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

When Universalism Becomes a Bully: Revisiting the Interplay Between Cultural Rights and Women's Rights

Xanthaki¹

2019

Human Rights Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the scope of the right to culture has never been more recognized nor clarified, culture itself is currently portrayed in some human rights narratives as a tool of oppression and an obstacle to human rights, especially women's rights. Certainly, cultural rationalizations that justify human rights violations and the misappropriation of culture by dominant (male) elites put a dent in the recognition of collective cultural rights. However, the article argues that the binary understanding of universality v culture and collective cultural rights ultimately harms women's rights, as such understanding does not reflect all women's experiences, priorities, and strategies. The article uses the example of indigenous women to highlight the importance of culture for some women. It suggests a paradigm shift from portraying minority and indigenous women as victims of their cultures to pushing for their empowerment through and beyond their cultures. In essence, the piece advocates for a multilayered, nuanced approach on women's rights that addresses universalism but also considers postcolonial feminist and anthropological critiques of human rights.

show abstract

“…Intersectionality is the key term for the third wave; this movement rejects essentialized notions of identity and embraces women of colour and the LGBTI community by concentrating on issues of ethnicity, social class, and sexuality. For a more detailed discussion, see Evans 2016. structive force forces change to happen. People could not have been the main cause of change in this system, because it was already functioning perfectly.…”

Section: Later Criticisms and Current Viewpointsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender Transformations in Prehistoric and Archaic Societies

Kirleis¹

2019

Scales of Transformation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In which chronological, spatial, and social contexts is gender a relevant social category that is noticeable in the archaeological material? How can transformations in social gender relations and identity be recognized archaeologically? Is the identity of prehistoric people defined by gender? If so, what is the accompanying cultural context? What about gender equality among the scientists working in archaeology? In what degree are research teams, as well as their scientific approaches, biased today? These and other burning questions are intensively discussed in this volume, which comprises 25 contributions presented at the international workshop ‘Gender Transformations in Prehistoric and Archaic Societies’, organised by the Collaborative Research Centre 1266 of Kiel University funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). The workshop offered a platform to discuss a broad range of approaches on the inter-dependencies between gender relations and socio-environmental transformation processes. Beyond a focus on the archaeology of women, gender archaeology offers a variety of possibilities to reconstruct the contribution of social groups differentiated e.g. by age, gender, and activities related to cultural transformation, based on the archaeological material. Thus, this volume includes papers dealing with different socio-economic units, from south-western Europe to Central Asia, between 15,000 and 1 BCE, paying particular attention to the scale of social reach. Since gender archaeology, and in particular feminist archaeology, also addresses the issue of scientific objectivity or bias, parts of this volume are dedicated to equal opportunity matters in archaeological academia across the globe. This is realised by bringing together feminist and female experiences from a range of countries, each with its own specific individual, cultural, and social perspectives and traditions. The papers are organised along three central topics: ‘Gendering fieldwork’, ‘Tracing gender transformations’, and ‘Gendering and shaping the environment’. By gendering the archaeological discussion on transformation processes, the contributions aim to more firmly embed gender-sensitive research in the archaeological agenda, not just in Europe, but world-wide.

show abstract

What Makes a (Third) Wave?

Cited by 24 publications

References 19 publications

Sexual Politics in Fiksimini: Analysis of Feminist Critical Discourse

Sexual Politics in Fiksimini: Analysis of Feminist Critical Discourse

When Universalism Becomes a Bully: Revisiting the Interplay Between Cultural Rights and Women's Rights

Gender Transformations in Prehistoric and Archaic Societies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About