What makes strategic narrative efficient: Ukraine on Russian e-news platforms

Abstract

Contributing to the ‘narrative turn’ in International Relations and offering an answer to the question ‘What makes a strategic narrative efficient?’, this article adds to the methodological theorization of the formation and projection phases of the narrative’s lifecycle. We suggest that the impact of the constructed image in the narrative can be reinforced by the interplay of at least three projection properties: (1) content accentuation and priming, through iterations; (2) content contextualization, through historical and cultural resonance with the consumers’ memories; and (3) content verbalization, through narrative tactics that evoke a range of the consumers’ involved attitudes to the framed image. These properties, being intrinsic ingredients of the projected content, tend to enhance emotions. In our work, they get traction in the antagonistic narrative tailored by the Russian propaganda to depict Ukraine orientated towards the European Union (EU). The empirical case study analyses articles published on the Russian e-news platforms portraying the EU granting Ukrainians visa-free travel to the Schengen area in 2017, a milestone in Ukraine–EU relations. We define Russia’s narrative, created in reaction to this event, as antagonistic and consider it to be a precursor of the aggressive narrative crafted/employed by Russia to justify its 2022 military assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty.

Emotive lexicon of the political narrative: Ukraine and the West in Chinese media

“…3-4;Drăgan, 2020, pp. 72-73;Chaban et al, 2023). Political strategic narratives are stories about states and their political systems, the citizens' identity and the world order they need.…”

“…Political narratives may appeal to our emotions with little references to realities, and with significant misdirection. Therefore, emotions, especially negative ones, play a pivotal role in formation and projection of politically relevant narratives (Chaban et al, 2023). Appealing to the emotional register suppresses the rational analysis, which is primarily demonstrated by the public reactions to negativity.…”