2018
DOI: 10.35188/unu-wider/2018/583-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What might explain today's conflicting narratives on global inequality?

Abstract: This study has been prepared within the UNU-WIDER project on 'Inequality in the giants'.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See, for instance, a recent discussion about different views on global inequality inRavallion (2021) orGradín et al (2021b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, for instance, a recent discussion about different views on global inequality inRavallion (2021) orGradín et al (2021b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such a trend of income inequality is on an upward trajectory. The empirical study of Yaish and Gabay‐Egozi (2019) finds that in Israel, the earning gap among the ethnic group has been in ascending order, though the study of Ravallion (2018) says that overall income inequality in the international context is in descending direction in the recent years. Income inequality refers to economic inequality that reflects in political and social inequality too.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Income and wealth inequalities potentially reduce identification and solidarity across social groups, and undermine the institutional framework underpinning cooperation (e.g., Bardhan et al, 2007;Dayton-Johnson and Bardhan, 2002). 2 When it comes to cooperation, many people have reciprocity preferences such that they are willing to contribute to the public 1 See Milanovic (2016), Piketty (2014) and Ravallion (2018). 2 There is also a body of work showing that ethnic or racial heterogeneity -by increasing social distance -leads to depletion of social capital (e.g., Alesina and La Ferrara, 2000;Alesina et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%