2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1861-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What people know about congenital CMV: an analysis of a large heterogeneous population through a web-based survey

Abstract: BackgroundCongenital CMV (cCMV) infection is a serious public health issue due to both its worldwide prevalence and the severe and permanent impairments it causes. However, awareness of this infection is low in the general population and among pregnant women, and it also seems to be generally disregarded by healthcare providers. The identification of factors behind this inadequate level of knowledge could provide a basis for future preventive measures. This study aimed at evaluating awareness of CMV and cCMV i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They examined knowledge, attitudes, screening and the use of antivirals in affected infants. The conclusion that improved recognition of congenital CMV is necessary reflects an increasing body of published work that comes to similar conclusions in the Netherlands , in the USA , in France , in Singapore and published most recently in a larger (10 190 subjects) Italian population . The recurrent message, including as outlined by Gunkel et al., is that knowledge of congenital CMV is very low amongst specialist obstetricians and paediatricians, primary physicians, parents and the general public.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They examined knowledge, attitudes, screening and the use of antivirals in affected infants. The conclusion that improved recognition of congenital CMV is necessary reflects an increasing body of published work that comes to similar conclusions in the Netherlands , in the USA , in France , in Singapore and published most recently in a larger (10 190 subjects) Italian population . The recurrent message, including as outlined by Gunkel et al., is that knowledge of congenital CMV is very low amongst specialist obstetricians and paediatricians, primary physicians, parents and the general public.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Of course, this varies between different measured parameters. In parallel with these studies, surveys (again using CAWI) of pregnant women and university staff suggest lower levels of knowledge about congenital CMV in the nonhealthcare worker population. Again this varies between populations, being higher in tertiary educated individuals than nontertiary educated individuals, lower in pregnant women (up to 39% in some populations) and varying between countries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Almost 90% of students were unable to identify any clinical material that could be a source of a virus or activity associated with the risk of CMV infection. For comparison, in a study conducted among 10,190 students (69.2%) and academic and administrative staff (30.8%) at the University of Milan [22], more than a half of the respondents (52.5%) had heard about cytomegalovirus, and 31.8% of them knew that it could cause congenital infection. In this group, only 16% of the respondents were unable to indicate any routes of virus transmission, and the remaining group of persons indicated saliva (67.9%), blood (67.6%), sexual contacts (58.4%), transfusion/transplant (53.0%), urine (42.7%) and breast milk (42.2%) as sources of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important application of DBS testing is the retrospective diagnosis of congenital Cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection; since CMV is the most common cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), CMV diagnosis should be recommended when children fail newborn hearing screening and should be carried out within the first weeks of life [3]. Although cCMV infection is the most common congenital infection, few people are aware of this infection and how to control or prevent it [4]. However, although DBS is a promising method for collecting microliters of blood samples, there are still some limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%