1998
DOI: 10.1075/itl.121-122.01puc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What predicts second language reading success? A Study of home and school variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pucci and Ulanoff (1998) conducted a study with a small sample of fourth-grade Spanish-speaking ELLs in which half of the students were proficient English readers and the other half were not. The number of books in the home, school-assigned books that children read, and authors and titles recognized were positively related to literacy outcomes.…”
Section: Home Language and Literacy Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pucci and Ulanoff (1998) conducted a study with a small sample of fourth-grade Spanish-speaking ELLs in which half of the students were proficient English readers and the other half were not. The number of books in the home, school-assigned books that children read, and authors and titles recognized were positively related to literacy outcomes.…”
Section: Home Language and Literacy Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While models of monolingual English reading have been well explored in the literature (see National Reading Panel, 2000, and Snow, Burns, & Griffin, 1998, for extensive reviews), such is not the case for reading models for children whose first language is other than English. Bilingual reading researchers have investigated the roles of home and school literacy practices (Aarts & Verhoeven, 1999; Connor, 1983; Leseman & de Jong, 1998; Pucci & Ulanoff, 1998), and language attitudes and cultural background (Abu-Rabia, 1995, 1996, 1998; Beech & Keys, 1997; Droop & Verhoeven, 1998; Jiménez, 2000) as they pertain to English reading outcomes. Others have examined the role of familiar story structure and text syntax (Bean, 1982), strategy use (García, 1998; Jiménez, 1997; Jiménez et al, 1995, 1996; Verhoeven, 1990), and metalinguistic awareness (Carlisle, Beeman, Davis, & Spharim, 1999).…”
Section: The Simple View Of Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, those studies that have investigated the English reading of ELLs (Spanish speakers as well as other nonnative English speakers) have rarely sought to define and test a specific model of comprehension. Rather, most studies have sought to predict variation in comprehension by exploring sociocultural domains such as the roles of home and school literacy practices (Aarts & Verhoeven, 1999; Connor, 1983; Leseman & de Jong, 1998; Pucci & Ulanoff, 1998) and language attitudes and cultural background (Abu-Rabia, 1995, 1996, 1998; Beech & Keys, 1997; Droop & Verhoeven, 1998; Jiménez, 2000). Other work has examined metacognitive skills including the role of familiar story structure and text syntax (Bean, 1982), strategy use (García, 1998; Jiménez, 1997; Jiménez, García, & Pearson, 1995, 1996; Verhoeven, 1990), and metalinguistic awareness (Carlisle, Beeman, Davis, & Spharim, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%