What’s in the body? Children’s annotated drawings

Abstract

This paper presents a study of children's ideas of the body's internal structure. Children between four and 13 years (N = 170) individually produced drawings. During each drawing session the children explained their drawings to a facilitator and added written labels either by themselves or, if they were too young to write, with the facilitator's help. The results provide an updated comprehensive picture of children in different age groups and their views on the internal structure of the body. The type and numbers of organs drawn are similar to those documented in previous studies. However, in comparison to recent studies, the children drew more organs, the brain was indicated almost as often as the heart, and the Valentine heart was frequently used as a symbol. In contrast with previous research, children drew connections between organs. This result calls for caution regarding conclusions made from decontextualized questions. The importance of providing children with the opportunity to clarify their drawings is emphasised since it otherwise becomes a question of the researcher's interpretation. The connections they draw, and explanations they give to their drawings, have interesting implications for understanding children's ideas, and hence both for teaching and learning and for science education research.

Understanding Pre-Service Teacher Conceptual Knowledge of Human Nutrition Processes Through Drawings

“…While it is true that this topic has been widely addressed in primary school classrooms, it should be noted that most of the work published to date has focused almost exclusively on the ideas of students (Andersson et al, 2019;Carvalho et al, 2004;Dempster & Stears, 2014;García-Barros et al, 2011;Óskarsdóttir et al, 2011;Prokop et al 2009;Reiss & Tunnicliffe, 2001;Reiss et al, 2002;Rowlands, 2004;Teixeira, 2000). Although common sense suggests that a teacher's knowledge and beliefs influence their teaching decisions, and that the results of educational research reinforce the idea that teachers play a key role in the design of their students' learning environments and experiences (Bahamonde & Gómez-Galindo, 2016), there are few studies referring to the assessment of the teachers' SMK, and even less so if the target in question is pre-service teachers.…”

Making science come alive : Student-generated stop-motion animations in science education

“…Other studies have focused on representations to explore conceptions of learners, especially young children who have not yet learned to write yet (J. Andersson, Löfgren, & Tibell, 2020;Reiss et al, 2002) and older students (Church, Gravel, & Rogers, 2007;Nielsen et al, 2020;Zhang & Linn, 2011). However, adopting an approach focusing on students' generated multiple representations entails embracing assessment as an ongoing part of learning (Tytler et al, 2018).…”

Feedback loop reasoning in physiological contexts

“…In particular, causal reasoning is one of the most basic cognitive processes that enable conceptual understandings and problem solving (Jonassen and Ionas 2008). When contemplating real-world phenomena, students often struggle to identify and apply relevant patterns to explain the underlying system's mechanisms (Andersson, Löfgren, and Tibell 2020;Düsing, Asshoff, and Hammann 2019;Eilam and Reisfeld 2017;Scott et al 2018). The reason might be that it is difficult for them to recognise relevant scientific concepts.…”