“…Much of the literature suggests CLDTs need to be clear and transparent in their roles, responsibilities, and service coordination at all levels (Hudson, 1995). A multi-disciplinary, multi-agency approach appears to be preferred, where the teams are locally accessible, cohesive, supportive of their members, effective in their performance, and adopt a person centred approach to care planning with service user involvement (Clare et al, 2017;Hudson, 1995;McKenzie et al, 2000;Slevin et al, 2008). Practical suggestions include the provision of specialist clinical psychology and psychiatry services for those with complex needs (e.g., mental health problems, challenging behaviour, contact with the criminal justice system), accessible information packs, a keyworker system, clear eligibility criteria, small caseloads (i.e., 10-15 service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 users), the capacity to deliver intensive support (e.g., through daily visits), and out of hours operation (Hudson, 1995;McKenzie et al, 2000;Shepherd, 1998).…”