What you see is not what you get: single-family house renovation and energy retrofit seen through the lens of sociomateriality

Buser, Martine; Carlsson, Veronica

doi:10.1080/01446193.2016.1250929

Cited by 22 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is an initial requirement for greater fiscal outlay, however there is potential for long-term savings from reducing pressure on key assets and balancing consignment across different bodies, closing the information gap between housing stock and the future needs of the older population, through an approach of joined-up governance (Boyle and Thomson, 2016;Gottlieb and Haugbølle, 2013;Hartmann et al, 2010). Therefore, in line with Foucault (1982), converting strategy into an open-ended communication is necessary if the concept is to travel across different types of institutions, however, it requires analytical clarity, organisational coherence and clear practical routines (Buser and Carlsson, 2017). Thus, there must be understanding and acceptance that health, housing and energy all have the potential to improve and promote good health, stimulate change and promote resilience through the retrofit industry through a greater level of collaborative working.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The loosening control of social housing: creating a holistic retrofit system for an ageing population through the lens of governmentality

Rodger

Callaghan

Thomson

2020

Construction Management and Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With social housing providing accommodation to the most vulnerable individuals within society it is recognised as a key priority area which has the potential to deliver holistic integration across a range of service providers. A need is emerging to examine the nexus between the energy, housing, health and social care sectors to understand how these separate but interlinked policy agendas are integrated in practice. Presented are the findings of interviews conducted with 24 key stakeholders under a thematic analysis, exploring the key themes and prevalent trends which shape the challenges to creating a holistic retrofit system within social housing for the improved wellbeing of older people, through the lens of governmentality. The analysis revealed that the ideological barriers presented prevent a holistic retrofit process and inhibit the potential to create successful collaboration within the healthy ageing agenda. The retrofit of domestic housing is centred around the concept of sustainability; however, the ideological prioritisation of economic considerations over people has created an increased pressure on resources, favouring ease and cost cutting over communication, collaboration, and efficiency. Significant change must occur within governance and organisational structures; increasing flexibility and alliances, creating a viable means of interaction to create solutions and improve implementation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The loosening control of social housing: creating a holistic retrofit system for an ageing population through the lens of governmentality

Rodger

Callaghan

Thomson

2020

Construction Management and Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Taking a socio-materiality perspective in their study on domestic retrofit, Buser and Carlsson (2017), like Kurokawa et al (2017), considered agency to be exercised by people and things.…”

Section: Individual Agency and Sustainability In The Construction Lit...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Agency and sustainability in the construction industry

Murtagh¹,

Sergeeva²

2021

Research Handbook of Sustainability Agency

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The construction industry is responsible for major environmental impact, particularly in terms of energy consumption, biodiversity and waste. As a sector, construction has unique characteristics including dependence on the temporary structure of the project for the delivery of its product, the built environment, and the requirement for joint working of many organisations, from micro to large. The lens of agency offers a valuable perspective with which to examine how individual professionals, projects and organisations can contribute to more sustainable outcomes. The chapter draws on the literature, primarily from psychology and construction research, to offer a review of relevant research from 2005. It explores conceptualisations of agency, and the role of agency in driving towards greater sustainability in construction. The findings note the dearth of research focusing directly on agency, and the evidence for mechanisms through which agency may exert influence, including professional and collective identities, professional and personal commitment to sustainability, narratives and framing, and the construction of knowledge. The chapter suggests questions for a future research agenda including examining success stories of sustainable construction through the lens of agency; exploring non-human agency such as materials, buildings and organisations; and the potential of altered discourses including visionary, future-oriented narratives.

show abstract

“…Recent studies gave relatively more emphasis on the importance of the human dimension of ER along with techno-economic aspects [34]. As stated by [35], buildings have a performative role in renovation decisions as they carry meaning, values, habits, and behavioral preferences. Hence it is important to pay attention to buildings' characteristics and residents' interactions with them.…”

Section: The Influential Factors On the Adoption Of Eemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures in Renovation of Single-Family Houses: A Comparative Approach

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inclusion of energy efficiency measures (EEMs) in the renovation of the single-family housing stock can unlock the potential for much-needed energy efficiency to tackle climate change. Energy renovation (ER) in single-family houses is often promoted as an aggregate process, and EEMs are treated homogenously without sufficient attention to their differences. This study applies a comparative analysis on common EEMs using chi-square test to investigate the influence of factors already found affecting the implementation of ER. This paper addresses the “personal” and “house-related” factors influencing the adoption of EEMs regardless of motives or barriers leading the adopters’ decisions. This strategy is useful to highlight the contexts leading to an increase in the adoption rate of different EEMs. The analysis is based on a questionnaire survey mailed in spring 2017 to 1550 single-family homeowners in the northern region of Sweden. Approximately 60% of respondents showed interest in adopting at least one EEM if they implement a major renovation. About 46% of respondents stated to have at least one indoor environmental problem (IEP) in their houses, and IEPs are found to have significant relations with homeowners’ interest to adopt several different EEMs. The policy implications related to different EEMs are discussed.

show abstract

What you see is not what you get: single-family house renovation and energy retrofit seen through the lens of sociomateriality

Cited by 22 publications

References 42 publications

The loosening control of social housing: creating a holistic retrofit system for an ageing population through the lens of governmentality

The loosening control of social housing: creating a holistic retrofit system for an ageing population through the lens of governmentality

Agency and sustainability in the construction industry

Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures in Renovation of Single-Family Houses: A Comparative Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About