2001
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6427.00175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whatever happened to biology? Reconnecting family therapy with its evolutionary origins

Abstract: This article argues for a rapprochement between family therapy and biological science. In spite of the prevailing tendency nowadays to write biology out of the story of family therapy, it has played a central historical and conceptual role in the origin of our discipline. Family therapists may have done themselves and their patients a disservice by distancing themselves from the discipline of biology; ignorance of modern biological ideas may be a serious handicap in the practice of therapy. The gap between con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been used to scaffold thinking to help see events from different perspectives, or different positions, by moving the mirror, as it were (Tomm, 1987). Systemic psychotherapy is a well-established method of engaging with complexity and has been used helpfully to approach issues of clinical risk (Mason, 1993), as well as diversity, race and gender (Burnham, 2011) but the depth of Bateson's contribution is still poorly understood (Launer, 2001;Palmer, 2021).…”
Section: Systemic Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been used to scaffold thinking to help see events from different perspectives, or different positions, by moving the mirror, as it were (Tomm, 1987). Systemic psychotherapy is a well-established method of engaging with complexity and has been used helpfully to approach issues of clinical risk (Mason, 1993), as well as diversity, race and gender (Burnham, 2011) but the depth of Bateson's contribution is still poorly understood (Launer, 2001;Palmer, 2021).…”
Section: Systemic Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many writers have detailed related weaknesses with regard to postmodernism's influence in family therapy (Flaskas, 1994;Frosh, 1995;Dallos and Urry, 1999), and have attempted to reconnect family therapy to its intellectual 'parents' and 'grandparents' within modernism through, for example, the evolutionary biology of Charles Darwin (Launer, 2001) and the communicative rationality of Jurgen Habermas (Donovan, 2003). I believe that family therapy might be enriched yet further by connecting it to its intellectual 'great grandparents' within 'pre-modernism' through the theory and practice of rhetoric.…”
Section: Forgotten Relatives In Family Therapy's Family Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see this as representing a natural synthesis of family systems medicine and narrativebased medicine, one that is informed by a range of sources within medicine, social sciences, and narratology but that is oriented primarily toward practice and training in primary care. We have focused a great deal on how to manage the challenges of a taking a narrative-based approach in a medical world of real biological constraints and hard facts (Launer, 1996(Launer, , 2001.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%