2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wheat domestication in light of haplotype analyses of the Brittle rachis 1 genes (BTR1-A and BTR1-B)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wild barley spikes present thin primary and secondary cell walls at rachis nodes, which makes them brittle and prone to shedding the seeds at maturity [35], while domesticated barley varieties have thickened cell walls at rachis nodes. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, this phenotype is related to loss of function of either one of two genes, namely Btr1 or Btr2 [35][36][37], and it was suggested that these genes were significant drivers in the evolution of the rachis-type disarticulation system of Triticeae grasses. In barley, closely related genes named Btr1-like and Btr2-like have also been identified, but they are not functional paralogs of Btr1 and Btr2 as they cannot complement btr1 and btr2 in cultivated barley [35].…”
Section: Non-brittle Rachismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wild barley spikes present thin primary and secondary cell walls at rachis nodes, which makes them brittle and prone to shedding the seeds at maturity [35], while domesticated barley varieties have thickened cell walls at rachis nodes. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, this phenotype is related to loss of function of either one of two genes, namely Btr1 or Btr2 [35][36][37], and it was suggested that these genes were significant drivers in the evolution of the rachis-type disarticulation system of Triticeae grasses. In barley, closely related genes named Btr1-like and Btr2-like have also been identified, but they are not functional paralogs of Btr1 and Btr2 as they cannot complement btr1 and btr2 in cultivated barley [35].…”
Section: Non-brittle Rachismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors interpreted these results as indicating that emmer was either domesticated independently in the northern and southern parts of the Fertile Crescent, or that domestication occurred in the Diyarbakir region and was followed by gene flow into the crop from wild populations in the southern Levant. The latter hypothesis was later supported by a reanalysis of the original AFLP data [12], but a more recent study of the Brittle rachis genes controlling ear shattering, a key domestication trait, has again indicated that the southern Levant played an important role in emmer domestication [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Spike traits are critical for domestication, as they determine the crop yield and the efficiency of the harvest. At least four different loci are involved in control of spike traits in wheat species, namely, spelt factor gene Q (threshability, rachis fragility and spike shape), non-brittle rachis 1 (Btr1 -spike fragility and its severity), tenacious glumes locus (Tgthreshability and rachis fragility) and soft glume locus (sog -threshability) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Q gene located on the long arm of the chromosome 5A controls a wide range of domestication-related traits in polyploid wheat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%