2017
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-annals-iv-2-w4-149-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wheat Ear Detection in Plots by Segmenting Mobile Laser Scanner Data

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The use of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) to study agricultural crop traits is becoming popular. Wheat plant traits such as crop height, biomass fractions and plant population are of interest to agronomists and biologists for the assessment of a genotype's performance in the environment. Among these performance indicators, plant population in the field is still widely estimated through manual counting which is a tedious and labour intensive task. The goal of this study is to explore the suitabili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field, the number of inflorescences (spikes, panicles) could be estimated from RGB images at flowering [32,34], as mentioned in section 2.2. The use of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is currently under development for the detection of wheat ears in the field, and recent studies report an average detection rate of 85%, aggregated over different flowering stages [98]. In most crops, the rest of the numerical components are best estimated or derived from measurements after harvest, some of them object of trivial image analysis, such as grain counting or grain dimensions, which can be carried out with flatbed scanners and free firmware.…”
Section: Phenotyping Yield Components and Underlying Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field, the number of inflorescences (spikes, panicles) could be estimated from RGB images at flowering [32,34], as mentioned in section 2.2. The use of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is currently under development for the detection of wheat ears in the field, and recent studies report an average detection rate of 85%, aggregated over different flowering stages [98]. In most crops, the rest of the numerical components are best estimated or derived from measurements after harvest, some of them object of trivial image analysis, such as grain counting or grain dimensions, which can be carried out with flatbed scanners and free firmware.…”
Section: Phenotyping Yield Components and Underlying Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hosoi and Omasa [20] adopted the LiDAR to collect cloud data of rice canopy at different growth stages and established the relationship between rice canopy volume and density according to voxel estimation. Velumani et al [21] installed the signal LMS400 LiDAR to scan wheat field, and the voxel segmentation and mean-shift algorithm were used to segment the wheat head point cloud. Then the number of higher point-cloud clusters was calculated as the number of wheat panicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), manned ground vehicles (MGVs), and tractor-based high-throughput phenotyping platforms (HTPPs) can rapidly obtain high-resolution top-view images of crop canopies. Researchers can extract phenotypic parameters [8], such as plant size [9], shape [10], and color [11], from the acquired images. For some specific phenotypic parameters, these approaches can be substituted for traditional manual measurements, improving the efficiency of collecting plant phenotypic information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%