2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13152937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wheat Yield Prediction Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles-Collected Red–Green–Blue Imagery

Abstract: Unmanned aerial vehicles-collected (UAVs) digital red–green–blue (RGB) images provided a cost-effective method for precision agriculture applications regarding yield prediction. This study aims to fully explore the potential of UAV-collected RGB images in yield prediction of winter wheat by comparing it to multi-source observations, including thermal, structure, volumetric metrics, and ground-observed leaf area index (LAI) and chlorophyll content under the same level or across different levels of nitrogen fert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of GY prediction in this study was lower (R 2 = 0.49, rRMSE = 6.07% in grain filling) in comparison with some previous studies. For example, [77] achieved R 2 = 0.93 using linear regression and a VI calculated from RGB-camera data. Using linear regression and data from the same camera as in this study, i.e., Sequoia, [17] modelled yield with maximal R 2 of 0.89.…”
Section: Phenotypic Variation and Relationship With Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of GY prediction in this study was lower (R 2 = 0.49, rRMSE = 6.07% in grain filling) in comparison with some previous studies. For example, [77] achieved R 2 = 0.93 using linear regression and a VI calculated from RGB-camera data. Using linear regression and data from the same camera as in this study, i.e., Sequoia, [17] modelled yield with maximal R 2 of 0.89.…”
Section: Phenotypic Variation and Relationship With Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UAV-based ultrahigh-GDS RGB images are helpful not only for estimating AGB ( Batistoti et al, 2019 ) but also for estimating chlorophyll ( Liu et al, 2021b ), nitrogen content ( Li et al, 2015 ), leaf area index ( Yue et al, 2018a ), and crop yield ( Zeng et al, 2021 ). These studies show that ultrahigh-GDS RGB images are rich in crop canopy surface information for monitoring growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning methods such as SVM, RF and BP and deep learning approaches such as alexnet and googlenet are excellent models for classification and they can be applied to perform the identification of maize phenology [115][116][117][118][119][120]. Nevertheless, phenocams provide an important approach for monitoring the phenological processes of vegetation, by analyzing the agricultural yield of crops by the high-throughput (high temporal and high spatial) data [121][122][123].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%