2019
DOI: 10.1108/jfbm-08-2018-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When do family firms consider issuing external equity? Understanding the contingent role of families’ need for control

Abstract: Purpose Prior research has argued that family firms are reluctant to consider external equity as a source of financing because they fear a loss of control, which would limit their socioemotional wealth. However, prior empirical research has neglected potential contingencies that determine whether family firms’ need for control affects their equity financing decisions. The purpose of this paper is to provide first insight into this research void. Design/methodology/approach The paper builds on rational choice… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(177 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, if our theoretical argument holds true, we would expect to find similar effects for customers characterized by risk avoidance and long-term orientation on an organizational rather than a country level (e.g., Muijen & Koopman, 1994). To illustrate, particularly family firms are characterized by long-term orientation, because they are interested in maximizing their "socioemotional wealth" rather than short-term financial outcomes (Tappeiner et al 2012;Kupp, Schmitz, & Habel, 2019). Thus, one may hypothesize the purchase probability for high-priced offerings to have dropped less during the coronavirus pandemic when selling to family firms rather than to public companies.…”
Section: Research Issuesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For example, if our theoretical argument holds true, we would expect to find similar effects for customers characterized by risk avoidance and long-term orientation on an organizational rather than a country level (e.g., Muijen & Koopman, 1994). To illustrate, particularly family firms are characterized by long-term orientation, because they are interested in maximizing their "socioemotional wealth" rather than short-term financial outcomes (Tappeiner et al 2012;Kupp, Schmitz, & Habel, 2019). Thus, one may hypothesize the purchase probability for high-priced offerings to have dropped less during the coronavirus pandemic when selling to family firms rather than to public companies.…”
Section: Research Issuesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Such family businesses do not make decisions purely based on economic reasons, but, rather, based on their motivation to preserve “socioemotional wealth” (SEW; e.g. Berrone, Cruz, and Gomez-Mejia 2012; Cennamo et al 2012; Kupp, Habel, and Schmitz 2019). One aspect of SEW is the family firms’ social relationships, which include “time-honored vendors and suppliers, who may be viewed as, or might actually be, members of the family” (Berrone, Cruz, and Gomez-Mejia 2012, p. 263).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, to sustain the family business during a crisis, the owners need to improve their CRM activities by accurately analyzing various types of customer data (Kupp et al, 2019;Kiwia et al, 2020). As humans cannot quickly and easily analyze the huge volume of customer data, family firm managers need to adopt an AI-integrated CRM system to achieve sustainability during and after the COVID-19 pandemic (Deb et al, 2018;Ghosh et al, 2019;Chatterjee et al, 2019;Galati et al, 2021;Singh, 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, to sustain the family business during a crisis, the owners need to improve their CRM activities by accurately analyzing various types of customer data (Kupp et al. , 2019; Kiwia et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%