When Do Gender Wage Differences Emerge? A Study of Azerbaijan's Labor Market

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E ABSTRACT When Do Gender Wage Differences Emerge? A Study of Azerbaijan's Labor MarketBuilding on recent analyses that find a sizeable, overall gender wage gap in Azerbaijan's workforce, this paper uses data on young workers in their early years in the labor market to understand how gender wage gaps evolve over time, if at all. Using a unique database from a survey of young people age 15-29 years old, we provide evidence that new labor market entrants begin with little or no gender differences in earnings, but a wage gap gradually emerges over time closer to the childbearing years. The gender wage gap grows from virtually zero, or even a small, positive gap in favor of women, until the age of 20 years to about 20% two years later and even more than 30% at the age of 29 years. The gap in labor supply rises from almost zero to about 20% during the years from 19 to 22, while the gap in hours worked falls from positive (up to 6 hours per week more than their male counterparts) to negative (up to -5 hours per week) over the same period in the life cycle. When decomposing the gap at different deciles of the wage distribution, it appears that most of it is at the lower and upper end of the distribution, among young adults and the prime-age workers. Selection of women into employment is strong and strongly skill-based: when controlling for sample selection bias, the gender gap becomes positive.JEL Classification: I21, J13, J15, J16, J24, J31, J7, P30

The gender pay gap in the USA: a matching study

“…In a study of US MBAs, Bertrand et al (2010) attribute a growing gender wage gap that increased with age to career interruptions as well as differences in training and weekly hours of work. More recently, similar findings have been noted for several developing countries-see, for example, Pastore (2010) and Pastore et al (2016). This study provides recent evidence for the USA which confirms the existence of much narrower differences in gender wages for younger than older workers.…”

The gender wage gap in Mongolia: Sectoral segregation as a driving factor

“…The sticky floor is a common phenomenon in Asian transition countries. Recent studies on China (Chi & Li, 2008) and Vietnam (Pham & Reilly, 2007; Vu & Yamada, 2018) found a sticky floor effect, while studies on Central Asian transition countries found a sticky floor effect with glass ceiling (Khitarishvili, 2016; Newell & Reilly, 2001; Pastore et al, 2016).…”

“…There is evidence of the sticky floor in China (Chi & Li, 2008) and Vietnam (Pham & Reilly, 2007; Vu & Yamada, 2018). However, evidence from Asian FSU countries indicates that the gender wage gap is higher at both the lower and upper ends of the wage distribution (Newell & Reilly, 2001; Khitarishvili, 2016; Pastore et al, 2016).…”

Returns to Education in Azerbaijan: Some New Estimates

“…There is a sizeable overall gender wage gap in Azerbaijan's workforce (Pastore et al 2016). Using a unique database from a survey of young people ages 15-29 years shows that new labor market entrants begin with little or no gender differences in earnings, but a wage gap gradually emerges over time closer to the childbearing years.…”