When Examining the Cerebral Functioning of Division 17, Which Organ Should We Dissect?

Horan, John J.; Hanish, Christine; Keen, Bethanne; Saberi, Dorit; Hird, Jeffrey S.

doi:10.1177/0011000093212014

Cited by 13 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are many important points to consider when interpreting the findings of the current study. First, although productivity studies are popular, there have been many disagreements over the appropriate methods to use, sources of data, and proper analyses of such data (e.g., Horan, Hanish, Keen, Saberi, & Hird, 1993). Some may object to our arbitrary definition of the "recent" literature on multicultural psychology by restricting the years that were considered to 1994-2007.…”

Section: Interpretive Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional and Individual Research Productivity in Five Nominated Multicultural Psychology Journals

Lau¹,

Cisco²,

Delgado‐Romero³

2008

J Multicult Couns & Deve

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

research productivity was examined across 5 highly nominated multicultural psychology journals. this yielded a ranking of 40 highly productive institutions and individuals between 1994 and 2007. the results are potentially useful in beginning to track trends in the publication of multicultural psychology studies in research journals. Methodological and interpretational limitations are discussed.se examinó la productividad de las investigaciones publicadas en 5 renombradas revistas de psicología multicultural. esto dio como resultado un ranking de 40 instituciones e individuos altamente productivos entre 1994 y 2007. los resultados son potencialmente útiles para empezar a rastrear tendencias en la publicación de estudios de psicología multicultural en revistas de investigación. también se discuten las limitaciones metodológicas y de interpretación.

show abstract

Section: Interpretive Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional and Individual Research Productivity in Five Nominated Multicultural Psychology Journals

Lau¹,

Cisco²,

Delgado‐Romero³

2008

J Multicult Couns & Deve

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At the time of my editorial decision on both papers (for details, see Horan, Hanish, Keen, Saberi, & Hird, 1993;Howard & Curtin, 1993), I found the claims of "triviality" and "bad feelings" to be less than compelling arguments against publication. It has become known as the "Horan-Howard debate (or debacle, depending on point of view)."…”

Section: Editing Experiencementioning

confidence: 99%

The Third Editorial Phase

Stone

1999

The Counseling Psychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A description of the content and policies of The Counseling Psychologist during the editorship of Gerald L. Stone (1991Stone ( -1996 is presented. Accompanying the description and relevant data is a story about the editing experience. Finally, comments about the relationship of TCP and larger social issues are discussed.I want to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.

show abstract

“…However, this mode of inquiry has been used by investigators into the relationship between membership in the American Psychological Association (APA), which has routinely published membership directories, and various indices of professional activity (Tryon, 1981a(Tryon, , 1981b. The productivity of members of Division 17 (Counseling Psychology) of the American Psychological Association was examined in articles by Horan and Erickson (1991), Horan, Hanish, Keen, Saberi, andHird (1993), andHoran, Weber, Fitzsimmons, Maglio, and. Horan, Hanish, et al conducted a PsycLIT search wherein they sought to identify all articles written by members and fellows of Division 17 over 17 years.…”

Section: T He Journal Of Counseling and Development (Jcd)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Publication Patterns of The Personnel and Guidance Journal/Journal of Counseling & Development: 1978 to 1993

Weinrach

Lustig

Chan

et al. 1998

Jour of Counseling & Develop

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purposes of this study were (a) to identify the primary institutional sources of articles to The Personnel and Guidance Journal/ Journal of Counseling & Development from 1978 to 1993 (Volumes 57-71); (b) to identify the primary individual contributors to this journal during the survey period; (c) to identify and compare the program affiliations of individual contributors by editor during the survey period; and (d) to speculate as to whether the study results, collectively, indicate a trend toward more psychologists than counselors contributing to this journal. A total of 1,843 articles were reviewed. Of the 2,198 authors, 69% were academicians and 31% were practitioners. The data suggest that there has been a clear pattern of more psychologists than counselors contributing to this journal.

show abstract

When Examining the Cerebral Functioning of Division 17, Which Organ Should We Dissect?

Cited by 13 publications

References 5 publications

Institutional and Individual Research Productivity in Five Nominated Multicultural Psychology Journals

Institutional and Individual Research Productivity in Five Nominated Multicultural Psychology Journals

The Third Editorial Phase

Publication Patterns of The Personnel and Guidance Journal/Journal of Counseling & Development: 1978 to 1993

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About