When hydrosociality encounters sediments: Transformed lives and livelihoods in the lower basin of the Ganges River

Abstract

The hydrosocial cycle is a central analytical framework in political ecological approaches to water. It helps foreground multiple and subtle interactions between water and society, culture and politics. However, to date it has dealt little with matters other than water flows. In river contexts, biotic and abiotic components play critical roles in the way people engage with and make a living out of rivers, beyond water. This article aims to advance the hydrosocial framework with a deeper consideration of the materiality of rivers. To initiate this approach, the focus is here on sediments. Lives and livelihoods connected to river sediments remain both officially and academically under-explored. This certainly applies to the context of the Lower Ganges basin whose active channels transport huge loads of sediments mainly originating from the Himalayan slopes. Building upon an environmental history perspective and drawing on three spatially nested cases in West Bengal, India, the paper analyses instances of water-sedimentsociety interactions. The general case study presents colonial state interventions in the Lower Ganges basin waterscapes. The second case study zooms the focus on the 2-km long Farakka Barrage. These explorations reveal how an 'imported' conceptual landwater divide infused those interventions that led to unforeseen effects on riverine lives and livelihoods. Focusing on Hamidpur char, situated few kilometres upstream of the barrage, the third case study recounts the contemporary efforts of local communities to obtain revision of administrative decisions unable to deal with 'muddyscapes'. Finally, the paper engages with recent debates on the concept of hybridity in land-water nexus to reflect on the specific meaning and role of sediments.

The retreat of the delta: a geomorphological history of the Po river basin during the twentieth century

“…An exceptional drought that began in 1921 and ended in 1922 accelerated this debate, revealing to producers and policy-makers the hydrological vulnerability of the hydroelectric energy regime. Writing immediately after the drought, state engineer Giulio de Marchi maintained that the consequences of the drought in northern Italy had lowered the annual production of the hydropower plant "as if no machines had functioned at all for two consecutive months" (Marchi 1922). At the time of the drought, early hydropower companies had built a few hydroelectric reservoirs, mostly in the Alpine tributaries.…”

New horizons for dredging research: The ecology and politics of harbor deepening in the southeastern United States

“…Given this tendency toward fragmentation, the hydrosocial cycle is a useful framework for analyzing the recursive relationships among water, society, and politics across multiple domains and scales (Linton & Budds, 2014; Swyngedouw, 2009; Wesselink, Kooy, & Warner, 2017). However, it tends to overlook the crucial role of sediment transport in river systems and livelihoods (Camargo, 2017; de Micheaux, Mukherjee, & Kull, 2018). Sediment is similarly “invisible” in water management, where it tends to be elided in decision‐making (Kondolf, Parrinello, & Schmitt, 2019).…”

Constellations of weathering: following the meteorological mobilities of Bangla bricks

“…Only a tiny percentage of this sediment is generated within Bangladesh, much of it originating from the highly erodible slopes of the upper Himalayas (Khalequzzaman 2019, no page). The loose structure of these relatively young mountains makes them vulnerable to erosion (Micheaux, Mukherjee, and Kull 2018). The monsoon plays a significant role, with frequent landslides and fluxes of large sedimentary particles occurring during the rainy season (Struck et al 2015).…”