2004
DOI: 10.1080/0959641042000233273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Muslims marry non‐Muslims: marriage as incorporation in a cape Muslim community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Bangstad argues that it is reductionistic to explain instances of "excommunication" using only the normative Islamic discourse on inter-religious marriage. Bangstad describes Mekaar as a community of active agents in which the high rate of intermarriage does not dissolve Islam, but rather reconstitutes a localized Islam that is vibrant and meaningful to its adherents (Bangstad 2004).…”
Section: Identity: Cause or Results Of Politics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Bangstad argues that it is reductionistic to explain instances of "excommunication" using only the normative Islamic discourse on inter-religious marriage. Bangstad describes Mekaar as a community of active agents in which the high rate of intermarriage does not dissolve Islam, but rather reconstitutes a localized Islam that is vibrant and meaningful to its adherents (Bangstad 2004).…”
Section: Identity: Cause or Results Of Politics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often categorized as "Christian-Muslim" or "Islamic-Christian", the couples who are the object of this research represent, thus, an emblematic case study of "mixedness", since they incorporate two layers of differences: religious, as the two partners are socialized into Islam and Catholicism respectively, and ethnic, as a white partner is married to a non-white partner. Despite this interplay between two levels of difference, in the public, and often in the academic debate, religious difference is assumed to be the primary conflictual dimension between partners (Ata 2003;Bangstad 2004;Allievi 2006;Al-Yousuf 2006;Roer-Strier and Ben Ezra 2006;Saraceno 2007;Alba and Foner 2015). The majority of research on religiously and ethnically mixed marriages is focused on couples' interactions and parenting styles as the main analytical dimension in exploring how partners deal with their heritages (Odasso 2016;Cerchiaro 2017;Varro 2003;Collet 2012;Arweck and Nesbitt 2010;McCarthy 2007;Murad 2005;Parisi 2016).…”
Section: Mixed Marriages Integration and Secularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Christian-Muslim couples represent an emblematic case-study within the phenomenon of mixed 3 marriages because, in the social space of the family, they incorporate ethnic and religious differences represented as "strong" and "conflicting" in the public hegemonic discourse (Ata 2003;Bangstad 2004;Allievi 2006;Al-Yousuf 2006;Roer-Strier and Ben Ezra 2006). The position of Christian and Islamic religious authorities, openly suspicious of this type of relationship, and the anti-Muslim discourses of the right-wing political parties that are growing in Europe, are important social factors which create a context of external pressure and hostility, influencing the lives and choices of these families.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But at the same time, marriage continues to be integral to kinship relations and the wider political and religious community, and attitudes towards intermarriage are often ambivalent (cf. Kringelbach 2016; though for an exception see Bangstad 2004). Often men’s and women’s experiences and expectations of the future intersect with religious concerns to produce asymmetric patterns of marriage and conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%