2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When reduced working time harms the environment: A panel threshold analysis for EU-15, 1970–2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some previous studies have also similarly indicated that reducing working time will lead to lower energy use and environmental pressure, partly due to the resultant reduction in income that prompts people to adopt more contained consumption and energy use behavior (Devetter and Rousseau 2011 ; King and van den Bergh 2017 ; Nässén and Larsson 2015 ). There are, however, other studies that indicate the relationship between average working hours and societal GHG emissions to be mixed (Fitzgerald et al 2018 ; Shao and Shen 2017 ). The time-use rebound effect triggered by changes in working time is also a factor that may complicate the assessment of mitigation potential, which according to Buhl and Acosta ( 2016 ) could include both the redistribution of time and losses in income.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous studies have also similarly indicated that reducing working time will lead to lower energy use and environmental pressure, partly due to the resultant reduction in income that prompts people to adopt more contained consumption and energy use behavior (Devetter and Rousseau 2011 ; King and van den Bergh 2017 ; Nässén and Larsson 2015 ). There are, however, other studies that indicate the relationship between average working hours and societal GHG emissions to be mixed (Fitzgerald et al 2018 ; Shao and Shen 2017 ). The time-use rebound effect triggered by changes in working time is also a factor that may complicate the assessment of mitigation potential, which according to Buhl and Acosta ( 2016 ) could include both the redistribution of time and losses in income.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, policymakers and businesses with funds may hesitate to disrupt social structures. Moreover, a reduced work week may harm the environment if people use their leisure time to consume more [69,70]. I would suggest that if a business reduces work from five to four days yet pays for five days, it may stipulate that employees use the fifth day (or part of it) for environmental initiatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of overtime reduces average productivity, measured as productivity per working hour (Shepard and Clifton, 2000). The environmental burden may increase once work time decreases below a certain threshold level (Shao and Shen, 2017). There is also a negative relation between work time and CO 2 emissions in developing Conceptualization: Crisis leadership activity Conceptualization: Leadership decisions and actions (Foster and Dye, 2005) Operationalization: Decisions and actions taken Flexibility in employment (Leung and Lam, 2004), lowering turnover and increasing employee retention (Dirani et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2015;Jayathilake et al, 2021;Stuart et al, 2021;Lewis and Sequeira, 2016;Kyndt et al, 2009) Securing the company's employees Sending employees on leave or downtime Building ethical attitudes by ensuring employee satisfaction and reducing employee turnover Yasin et al (2020), Hensvik et al (2021) Securing the company's employees…”
Section: Leadership Decisions and Responses In Times Of Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of overtime reduces average productivity, measured as productivity per working hour (Shepard and Clifton, 2000). The environmental burden may increase once work time decreases below a certain threshold level (Shao and Shen, 2017). There is also a negative relation between work time and CO 2 emissions in developing economies, with the suggestion that this might result from carbon-intensive leisure activities (Shao and Rodríguez-Labajos, 2016).…”
Section: Leadership Decisions and Responses In Times Of Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%