2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When two become one: Temporally dynamic integration of the face and voice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We investigated the temporal dynamics through which voice processing interacts with face processing in sex categorization (Freeman & Ambady, 2011). Participants categorized slightly ambiguous male and female faces by sex while simultaneously presented with a sex-typical voice (e.g., masculinized male voice for a male face) or a sex-atypical voice (e.g., feminized male voice for a male face).…”
Section: Phenomenon 5: Continuous Face-voice Interactivity In Social mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigated the temporal dynamics through which voice processing interacts with face processing in sex categorization (Freeman & Ambady, 2011). Participants categorized slightly ambiguous male and female faces by sex while simultaneously presented with a sex-typical voice (e.g., masculinized male voice for a male face) or a sex-atypical voice (e.g., feminized male voice for a male face).…”
Section: Phenomenon 5: Continuous Face-voice Interactivity In Social mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, judgments about the sex of a face are influenced by the simultaneous sound of a voice. As a result, when deciding on the sex of a face, hand movement deviates toward the opposite sex when matched with a sex-atypical voice (Freeman & Ambady, 2011b), suggesting that the auditory perception continually affected the visual perception in this process. There is also evidence of cross-modal interaction in the spatial domain.…”
Section: Cross-modal Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once relevant perceptual summaries are activated, they may interact to influence the judgment. Empirical evidence is currently insufficient for us to describe the precise nature of interactions among perceptual summaries; we instead base this hypothesis on evidence that interactivity (rather than independence) is the rule in individual person perception (e.g., Freeman & Ambady, 2011b;Freeman, Penner, Saperstein, Scheutz, & Ambady, 2011;Johnson, Freeman, & Pauker, 2012). For example, prior to reaching a judgment about an Asian male, perceivers activate stereotypes about Asians and about males as well as females (which are cognitivelyassociated with ''Asian'') and finally integrate this information before rendering the judgment (Johnson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Application Hypothesis 4: Interactions At Time Of Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our emphasis on visual processes is practical, rather than theoretical. While there is some evidence regarding the role of auditory (Bachorowski & Owren, 2001;Freeman & Ambady, 2011b;Piazza, Sweeny, Wessel, Silver, & Whitney, 2013), tactile (Hertenstein, Keltner, App, Bulleit, & Jaskolka, 2006), and olfactory (Chaix, Cao, & Donnelly, 2008;Takahashi, Nakashima, Hong, & Watanabe, 2005;Zhou & Chen, 2009) processes in social thought, the specific nature of these processes in social cognition is relatively understudied and somewhat unclear. Conversely, there is a large literature that has provided new and important insights into the instrumental role of visual mechanisms in social cognitions, emotions, and behavior (Adams et al, 2011;Balcetis & Lassiter, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%