2011
DOI: 10.1086/658469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Your World Must Be Defended: Choosing Products to Justify the System

Abstract: Consumers are often strongly motivated to view themselves as part of a legitimate and fair external system. Our research focuses on how individuals adopt distinct ways of defending their system when it is threatened and, in particular, how this is revealed in their consumption choices. We find that although individuals differ in how confident they are in the legitimacy of their system, they do not differ in their motivation to defend the system when it is threatened. Instead, they simply adopt different method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
75
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In essence, individuals may use many different manifestations of boundaries as a means of achieving structured consumption in response to threats to control. This is consistent with the growing body of research in consumer behavior that demonstrates that consumers respond to threats in their lives with a variety of different consumption behaviors (e.g., Cutright et al 2011;Ferraro, Shiv, and Bettman 2005;Gao, Wheeler, and Shiv 2008;Rucker and Galinsky 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In essence, individuals may use many different manifestations of boundaries as a means of achieving structured consumption in response to threats to control. This is consistent with the growing body of research in consumer behavior that demonstrates that consumers respond to threats in their lives with a variety of different consumption behaviors (e.g., Cutright et al 2011;Ferraro, Shiv, and Bettman 2005;Gao, Wheeler, and Shiv 2008;Rucker and Galinsky 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is therefore conceivable that men may have found this information more relevant than women. Thus, in Study 2 I used a manipulation that earlier research has shown to induce the system justification motive in both men and women (Cutright, Wu, Banfield, Kay, & Fitzsimons, 2011;Kay et al, 2009;Lau, Kay, & Spencer, 2008). Procedure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When conservatives experience a high level of threat or uncertainty, they may attempt to restore feelings of control (Heine, Proulx, & Vohs, 2006), thereby decreasing variety‐seeking and limiting choice to things that are familiar. Such a threat might take the form of a power threat, (Rucker & Galinsky, 2008), system threat (Cutright, Wu, Banfield, Kay, & Fitzsimons, 2011), or mortality salience (Greenberg, Pyszczynski, & Solomon, 1986). Alternatively, unfamiliar shopping environments and/or unexpected events during the in‐store experience could reduce or reverse the positive effect of conservatism on variety‐seeking, due to a heightened need to manage uncertainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%