No abstract

Consumers are often strongly motivated to view themselves as part of a legitimate and fair external system. Our research focuses on how individuals adopt distinct ways of defending their system when it is threatened and, in particular, how this is revealed in their consumption choices. We find that although individuals differ in how confident they are in the legitimacy of their system, they do not differ in their motivation to defend the system when it is threatened. Instead, they simply adopt different methods of defense. Specifically, when an important system is (verbally) attacked, individuals who are the least confident in the legitimacy of the system seek and appreciate consumption choices that allow them to indirectly and subtly defend the system. Conversely, individuals who are highly confident in the system reject indirect opportunities of defense and seek consumption choices that allow them to defend the system in direct and explicit ways.

Radiologists may be the first to suggest the diagnosis of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). PRES is associated with many diverse clinical entities, the most common of which are eclampsia, hypertension, and immunosuppressive treatment. Radiologists should be aware of the spectrum of imaging findings in PRES. When promptly recognized and treated, the symptoms and radiological abnormalities can be completely reversed. When unrecognized, patients can progress to ischemia, massive infarction, and death. In this review, we present an overview of the unique signs observed on computed tomography and magnetic resonance images in PRES that can help in the early diagnosis and treatment that is highly effective in this syndrome.

Background: As the result of public health authority responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, pain clinics have had to cease providing in-person appointments to reduce contact between patients and staff. Over the past decade, Canadians living with chronic pain have faced long waiting times for care within multidisciplinary pain clinics. We are concerned that ceasing in-person pain services exacerbates the daily hardships already faced by Canadians living with chronic pain. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Canadian pain clinics, their responses, and changes to clinic practices that might be maintained when the pandemic is over. Methods: A survey of Canadian adult multidisciplinary pain clinics was conducted to determine impacts on medical and allied health care services and the strategies used to deliver care to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Responses received from 17 adult pain clinics across Canada showed that adult multidisciplinary pain clinics had to cease or significantly reduce in-person patient contacts during the COVID-19 pandemic and responded by offering telehealth options. Despite their efforts, patients are waiting longer and have lost access to usual care. Increased levels of pain, stress, and medication use, particularly opioids and cannabinoids, were reported. Conclusions: Access to adaptable and innovative technologies, such as telehealth, can assist in the care of the one in five Canadians living with chronic pain during times of crises and must be included as a vital component of a comprehensive Canadian pain strategy. RÉSUMÉ Contexte: Suite aux mesures prises par les autorités de santé publique en réponse à la pandémie de COVID-19, les cliniques antidouleur ont dû cesser de proposer des rendezvous en personne afin de réduire les contacts entre les patients et le personnel. Au cours de la dernière décennie, les Canadiens vivant avec la douleur chronique ont dû faire face à de longs délais d'attente pour obtenir des soins dans les cliniques antidouleur multidisciplinaires. Nous sommes préoccupés par le fait que l'arrêt des services antidouleur en personne exacerbe les difficultés quotidiennes auxquelles sont déjà confrontés les Canadiens qui vivent avec la douleur chronique. Objectifs: Cette étude visait à évaluer les repercussions de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur les cliniques antidouleur au Canada, leurs réactions et les changements dans leurs pratiques qui pourraient être maintenus en raison de la pandémie. Méthodes: Une enquête a été menée auprès des cliniques antidouleur multidisciplinaires pour adultes au Canada afin de determiner les répercussions sur les services médicaux et les services paramédicaux, ainsi que les strategies utilisées pout fournir des soins de santé aux patients pendant la pandémie de COVID-19. Résultats: Les réponses reçues de 17 cliniques antidouleur pour adultes au Canada ont montré que les cliniques antidouleur multidisciplinaires pour adultes avaient dû cesser ou réduire considérablement les contacts en pe...

Three studies demonstrate how individual differences in confidence in the sociopolitical system interact with threats that engage the system justification motive to produce system defense. Following threat, participants low, but not high, in system confidence increasingly defended the system, by rejecting system change (Study 1) and preferring domestic over international products (Studies 2 and 3). These findings contribute to the literature on system justification theory in two ways: First, they expand scholars' understanding of when and for whom system-level threats instigate motivational processes of system defense, and, second, they demonstrate that the system justification motive is not merely another example of worldview verification phenomena but instead involves a specific goal to defend the status quo.