2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where are the trees? Extent, configuration, and drivers of poor forest recovery 30 years after the 1988 Yellowstone fires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4a) despite vast ecological, economical, and cultural differences between the two vegetation types (Stine et al 2014). Researchers have attempted to differentiate between tree-dominated and shrub-dominated sites in post-fire mixed conifer forest landscapes by using multispectral data from fall, winter, and spring months to isolate conifer trees from deciduous trees and shrubs (Vanderhoof et al 2021;Kiel and Turner 2022), but these protocols are not expected to differentiate conifers and evergreen shrubs when assessing spectral recovery over short time periods (i.e., before the height of conifers exceeds the maximum expected height of evergreen shrubs). We recognize that studies using spectral recovery metrics often analyze postfire recovery over brief periods that do not reflect the expected period of recovery of mixed conifer forests following a stand-replacing, high severity fire.…”
Section: Fast Spectral Recovery Did Not Often Coincide With Forest Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a) despite vast ecological, economical, and cultural differences between the two vegetation types (Stine et al 2014). Researchers have attempted to differentiate between tree-dominated and shrub-dominated sites in post-fire mixed conifer forest landscapes by using multispectral data from fall, winter, and spring months to isolate conifer trees from deciduous trees and shrubs (Vanderhoof et al 2021;Kiel and Turner 2022), but these protocols are not expected to differentiate conifers and evergreen shrubs when assessing spectral recovery over short time periods (i.e., before the height of conifers exceeds the maximum expected height of evergreen shrubs). We recognize that studies using spectral recovery metrics often analyze postfire recovery over brief periods that do not reflect the expected period of recovery of mixed conifer forests following a stand-replacing, high severity fire.…”
Section: Fast Spectral Recovery Did Not Often Coincide With Forest Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This baseline could subsequently be used to assess a recent wave of tree mortality-triggered by severe drought-in relation to the long-term variation of the system, giving a first indication that disturbance regimes have moved outside of their recent range of variability (Senf & Seidl 2021b). While the remote sensing of disturbances has made great advances in recent years, analyzing ecological responses to disturbance from space remains challenging, because it can take years or decades before satellite data can differentiate pathways of recovery (Kiel & Turner 2022). Novel analysis approaches, such as spectral unmixing (Viana-Soto et al 2022), can help to make inferences in this regard.…”
Section: Tools For Detecting Diagnosing and Projecting Disturbance Ch...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the presence/absence of Scots pine and European aspen regeneration across the 223 plots as response variable and a set of environmental drivers as covariates (Table 1). We used the existing literature to select the most important environmental variables guiding post-fire forest recovery (e. g., Marzano et al 2013;Perrault-Hébert et al 2017;Haffey et al 2018;Andrus et al 2022;Kiel and Turner 2022).…”
Section: Drivers Of Forest Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%