Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems

Abstract

SummaryAs employees find themselves in geographically separated teams, the loss of face-to-face interaction has led to the development of new monitoring technologies that provide availability information for enhancing collaboration. Drawing on diverse literatures in electronic performance monitoring, computer supported cooperative work, privacy, and fairness, a comprehensive theoretical model of monitoring acceptance was developed to examine the effects of being monitored for availability. In the first study, over 600 employees from a large number of organizations responded to one of a variety of monitoring system characteristics. Although the model found strong support overall, results suggest that technical solutions, such as manipulating the characteristics of the awareness system, are not sufficient to ensure fairness and privacy. A second, focus group study, adds support for the theoretical model and provides an explanation for these quantitative results concerning system characteristics. Specifically, the qualitative evidence suggests that these systems can invade employees' psychological barriers-and thus manipulating the technology will only have small effects on fairness and privacy because the technology has already crossed the line from benign to invasive. The paper concludes by presenting theoretical and practical implications for the consideration of psychological boundaries in the design and use of ubiquitous monitoring and communication technologies.

Creating Reciprocal Value Through Operational Transparency

“…These findings hold particular promise as significant value may be created and captured collectively, without requiring extensive investments or adjustments to existing operating systems, and without incurring the individual and organizational costs often associated with traditional monitoring strategies (Alder and Ambrose 2005, Chalykoff and Kochan 1989, Zweig and Webster 2002 and training programs.…”

Big Brother or big bother? E‐monitoring the salesforce

“…Customer orientation requires adaptability and the associated level of discretion, judgment, and flexibility on the part of the salesperson. E-monitoring systems constrain responses and limit solutions (Douthitt and Aiello, 2001;Zweig and Webster, 2002).…”

Apportioning energy consumption in the workplace: a review of issues in using metering data to motivate staff to save energy

“…Particular forms of monitoring (e.g. presence detection) may transgress public-private boundaries in such an invasive manner, however, that they are liable to provoke negative reactions regardless of how they are implemented (Zweig and Webster 2002).…”