2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where's the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
224
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
13
224
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…At a more general level, widening the lens on our object of study to include multimodal communication brings a level of ecological validity to the scientific investigation of language that is much needed and currently argued for by scholars from different fields [61,62].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a more general level, widening the lens on our object of study to include multimodal communication brings a level of ecological validity to the scientific investigation of language that is much needed and currently argued for by scholars from different fields [61,62].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And yet, recent emphasis on the sensorimotor nature of the enactive mind has left autonomy out of focus, centring the debate around a definitive victory over the notion of representation (Hutto 2005;Hutto and Myin 2012;Menary 2006), the clarification of the sensorimotor constitution of experience and the nature of skills and knowledge of sensorimotor contingencies (Noë 2004;O'Regan and Noë 2001) or, more broadly, the conception of cognition as ''subserving action and being grounded in sensorimotor coupling'' (Engel 2010;Engel et al 2013) assuming that ''ultimately, there is no prospect of understanding minds without reference to interaction between organisms and their environments'' (Hutto and Myin 2012, p. 4). These approaches conceive of themselves as enactivists, explicitly following TEM's call to study cognition in terms of embodied action, and reclaiming the canonical definition of enactivism:…”
Section: Enactivism and Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…processing'') in the formation of such patterns is nowadays being increasingly acknowledged (Engel et al 2013). 17 The degree to which these large-scale distributed neurodynamic patterns interrelate so as to determine collective or global-organizational viability conditions (i.e.…”
Section: Sensorimotor Autonomy Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varela, Thompson and Rosch (1991) pioneered the view of embodiment in relation to mind whereby cognition rather than being conceived of as a detached re-construction of the world is seen as a suite of dynamic processes enabling embodied activity (Engel et al, 2013). Action is what enables perception and cognition rather than being in secondary role to them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%