2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.03.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where to Fenestrate in Aortic Dissection Type B? An Ex Vivo Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study and our previous studies showed that this ex vivo porcine model is a representative model to study different aspects of ABAD. 14,17 In all 3 models, the aortic wall elasticity (expressed in AP diameter change) was significantly decreased after siliconizing. The diameter of the MFL and DFL expanded significantly in all models when the aortic wall elasticity decreased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study and our previous studies showed that this ex vivo porcine model is a representative model to study different aspects of ABAD. 14,17 In all 3 models, the aortic wall elasticity (expressed in AP diameter change) was significantly decreased after siliconizing. The diameter of the MFL and DFL expanded significantly in all models when the aortic wall elasticity decreased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…An in vitro study in the previously validated aortic dissection model has the potential to study a specific parameter in a controlled setting. 14,17 In this study, a porcine aorta—instead of synthetic polymer or silicon tubing—was used as a “modeled” aorta. 7,18 Research showed that elasticity and morphology of a young porcine aorta corresponds to the human thoracic aorta under 65 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 This implies together with our previously published studies that our ex-vivo porcine aorta model is a representative model to study uTBAD. 7,22 Earlier research on aortic dissection by 4D flow MRI was only performed using silicon models and resulted in hemodynamic insights into aortic dissection.4 Other in-vitro study on hemodynamics in aorta dissection showed that if a distal tear in the false lumen was absent the diastolic pressure in the false lumen increased compared to the true lumen diastolic pressure. 14 However, it should be noted that these last 2 mentioned studies did not use biological tissue but were based on experiments with synthetic polymer or silicon tubing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors recently suggested the potential benefit of routine fenestration in the distal aorta to prevent or improve spinal cord malperfusion in patients where stent graft within the descending thoracic aorta would be deployed with lots of intercostal arteries seen arising from the false lumen. Moreover, and contrary to what has been generally assumed, the authors suggest this would result in largest false lumen reduction and thus lower risk of aneurysmal degeneration of the distal aorta [10]. The understanding of the mechanisms of spinal cord malperfusion in this setting remain somehow unclear and it may feel premature to rely on single preoperative CTA analysis at this stage to decide on extensive coverage followed by fenestration to limit any spinal cord ischemia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%