2019
DOI: 10.1177/0019793919846450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where Women Make a Difference: Gender Quotas and Firms’ Performance in Three European Countries

Abstract: The authors study the effect of corporate board gender quotas on firm performance in France, Italy, and Spain. The identification strategy exploits the exogenous variation in mandated gender quotas within country and over time and uses a counterfactual methodology. Using firm-level accounting data and a difference-in-difference estimator, the authors find that gender quotas had either a negative or an insignificant effect on firm performance in the countries considered with the exception of Italy, where they f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
60
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical results show that women on corporate boards contribute to effective board processes and outcomes when their proposed ideas during board meetings are accepted by other board members, implemented by the management and impact positively on organizations' outcomes such as enhanced financial, product and staff outcomes. This finding seems to give credence to previous results by Srinidhi et al (2020) and Arioglu (2020) but inconsistent with prior studies that found negative outcomes (Comi et al, 2020;Martinez-Jimenez et al, 2020), or no significant impact (e.g., Arora & Singh, 2020;Zajiji et al, 2020). This result, from the perspectives of the resource dependence and resource-based theories, suggests that female directors of organizations are vital resources because they are sources of wise counsel, useful ideas and advice (Hillman & Dalziel, 2003) for making positive organizational changes or impacts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The empirical results show that women on corporate boards contribute to effective board processes and outcomes when their proposed ideas during board meetings are accepted by other board members, implemented by the management and impact positively on organizations' outcomes such as enhanced financial, product and staff outcomes. This finding seems to give credence to previous results by Srinidhi et al (2020) and Arioglu (2020) but inconsistent with prior studies that found negative outcomes (Comi et al, 2020;Martinez-Jimenez et al, 2020), or no significant impact (e.g., Arora & Singh, 2020;Zajiji et al, 2020). This result, from the perspectives of the resource dependence and resource-based theories, suggests that female directors of organizations are vital resources because they are sources of wise counsel, useful ideas and advice (Hillman & Dalziel, 2003) for making positive organizational changes or impacts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Empirically, various studies have examined the influence of female directors or gender diversity on the effectiveness of board processes and organizational outcomes. While some found positive results (e.g., Arioglu, 2020;Li & Li, 2020;Kilic & Kuzey, 2016;Moussa, 2019;Song et al, 2020), others found negative outcomes (Comi et al, 2020;Martinez-Jimenez et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2019) or no significant impact (e.g., Arora & Singh, 2020;Zajiji et al, 2020). This suggests that there is still a lack of consensus in the extant research on the contribution of women on corporate boards to the effectiveness of board processes and organizational effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive impacts were also recorded by Hinnerich and Jansson (2017) in Sweden and by Ferrari et al (2016) in Italy. However, a multi-country study by Comi et al (2020) showed that quotas had either a negative or an insignificant effect on firm performance-except for Italy. Empirical studies based on quota-free identification have delivered mixed results as well (Adams, 2016;Kim and Starks, 2016).…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Así, por ejemplo, Mateos de Cabo et al ( 2019) encuentran, para una muestra de empresas pequeñas y medianas que sólo el 9 % de las empresas analizadas cumplían con la cuota, revelando su falta de efectividad. Los estudios sobre el impacto de las recomendaciones de genero incluidas en los códigos de gobierno corporativo son aún escasos (Willey, 2017), así como los estudios sobre el impacto de las propuestas de cuotas (Hinnerich y Jansson, 2017) y los estudios con perspectiva comparada (Comi et al, 2017;Labelle et al, 2015;Lending y Vahamma, 2017;Sojo et al, 2016). La ausencia de una amplia evidencia empírica sobre el impacto de los códigos y las propuestas de cuotas, y la evidencia empírica no concluyente sobre el efecto de las cuotas señala la necesidad de seguir investigando para examinar el impacto de la normativa que trata de promover la diversidad de género en los consejos sobre la presencia de las mujeres en los consejos de administración (y en los comités), sobre las tipologías de consejero, características de las mujeres consejeras, también sobre la presencia de mujeres en la alta dirección; y sobre su impacto en el comportamiento de la empresa.…”
Section: Bases Teóricas E Hipótesis De Trabajounclassified