2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which Algorithms Suit Which Learning Environments? A Comparative Study of Recommender Systems in TEL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This automatically generated information on collaboration processes can in turn be used in learning analytics systems, for example, to facilitate an exchange of ideas. Machine learning is also used in the context of recommender systems that aim at providing learners with the most useful learning materials according to their previous learning trajectory (e.g., Drachsler et al 2015;Kopeinik et al 2016;Moskaliuk et al 2011).…”
Section: Automatic Text Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This automatically generated information on collaboration processes can in turn be used in learning analytics systems, for example, to facilitate an exchange of ideas. Machine learning is also used in the context of recommender systems that aim at providing learners with the most useful learning materials according to their previous learning trajectory (e.g., Drachsler et al 2015;Kopeinik et al 2016;Moskaliuk et al 2011).…”
Section: Automatic Text Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research papers Model of human categorization [17,23,35] Activation processes in human memory [18,21,24,37] Informal learning se ings [5][6][7] Resource recommendations Research papers A ention-interpretation dynamics [15,34] Tag and time information [27,28] Recommendation evaluation Research papers Real-world folksonomies [20] Technology enhanced learning se ings [16] Hashtag recommendations…”
Section: Tag Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing Recommendation Algorithms in Technology Enhanced Learning Settings. Kopeinik et al [16] is another example of using TagRec for the evaluation of a variety of algorithms on di erent o ine datasets. e paper focused on technologyenhanced formal and informal learning environments, where due to fast changing domains and characteristic group learning settings, data is typically sparse.…”
Section: Recommendation Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approach and Methods. A very simple, though relatively effective, tag recommendation strategy is the Most Popular (MP) algorithm [19,22]. We however assume that a frequency-based, computationally simple recommendation strategy may be even more successful, if it is grounded on a thorough understanding of how humans process information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, offline data studies are limited to evaluating the prediction of user behaviour. In our previous work [24,22], we have intensively investigated the suitability of two tag recommendation approaches via offline studies [22]: the first of these, known as BLL implements the Base Level Learning Equation [1], which models the frequency and recency of past tag use. The second algorithm, known as Minerva [18,36], incorporates tag use frequency as well as semantic context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%