Which Bayley-III cut-off values should be used in different developmental levels?

Çelik, Pelin; Sucaklı, İclal Ayrancı; Yakut, Ibrahim

doi:10.3906/sag-1910-69

Cited by 20 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, there are concerns over the standardization of the Bayley-III and the use of US norms in different countries, given widespread cross-cultural evidence for the overestimation of cognitive function using Bayley-III norms. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The present study followed the recommendation of using a cut-off for mild cognitive delay of less than 1 SD below the mean of a geographically relevant control group, to improve the detection of developmental delay. 15,22 Previous researchers reported this cut-off to fall around 90, based on a mean cognitive composite score of approximately 105 and an SD of 15.…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a touchscreen assessment tool to screen for cognitive delay at 24 months

Casey

Thachuthara

Fogarty

et al. 2023

Develop Med Child Neuro

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Early identification of cognitive delay is important to increase early intervention for at-risk children. Such identification is largely reliant on parent-report questionnaires, such as the Parent Report of Children's Abilities, Revised 1 or the Ages and Stages Questionnaire. 2 Depending on the screening results, children may have the opportunity to complete full developmental assessments conducted by trained assessors. These include the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III), 3 which has strong language, administrator, and cultural biases. 4 Recent advances in touchscreen technology have the potential to be harnessed for neurodevelopmental assessment that is more child-driven and less administrator-dependent than parentreport questionnaires or full developmental batteries. 5,6 This is increasingly feasible as a testing tool, given growing empirical evidence that children acquire the fine motor skills required for touchscreen use before preschool years, across languages and cultures, including Ireland, the UK, Spain, and Malawi. [6][7][8] The use of a lightweight portable touchscreen assessment may offer more accessible cognitive testing for children with mobility, motor, or sensory issues, who may currently struggle to engage in physically or sensory-demanding tasks typically involved in developmental batteries. 3,9

show abstract

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a touchscreen assessment tool to screen for cognitive delay at 24 months

Casey

Thachuthara

Fogarty

et al. 2023

Develop Med Child Neuro

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As an example, those exposed to PM 10 levels at the 75 th percentile (32.50 µg/m 3 ) compared to the 25 th percentile (26.64 µg/m 3 ) of exposure were predicted to have a three point lower composite cognitive score. For context, in the current study, 16% of participants had a composite cognitive score that indicated some degree of impairment [ 40 , 41 ]. If all participants had PM 10 levels at the 75 th percentile of exposure, the prevalence of cognitive impairment would be predicted to increase to 22%, which highlights the importance of even moderate increases in early-life exposure.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollution is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Higher prenatal ambient air pollution exposure has been associated with impaired neurodevelopment in preschoolers and school-aged children. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between prenatal ambient air pollution exposure and neurodevelopment during infancy. Methods This study examined 161 Latino mother-infant pairs from the Southern California Mother’s Milk Study. Exposure assessments included prenatal nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter smaller than 2.5 and 10 microns in diameter (PM2.5 and PM10, respectively). The pregnancy period was also examined as three windows, early, mid, and late, which describe the first, middle, and last three months of pregnancy. Infant neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age were measured using the Bayley-III Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. Multivariable linear models and distributed lag linear models (DLM) were used to examine relationships between prenatal exposures and neurodevelopmental scores, adjusting for socioeconomic status, breastfeeding frequency, time of delivery, pre-pregnancy body mass index, and infant birthweight and sex. Results Higher prenatal exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 was negatively associated with composite cognitive score (β = -2.01 [-3.89, -0.13] and β = -1.97 [-3.83, -0.10], respectively). In addition, higher average prenatal exposure to PM10 was negatively associated with composite motor (β = -2.35 [-3.95, -0.74]), scaled motor (β = -0.77 [-1.30, -0.24]), gross motor (β = -0.37 [-0.70, -0.04]), fine motor (β = -0.40 [-0.71, -0.09]), composite language (β = -1.87 [-3.52, -0.22]), scaled language (β = -0.61 [-1.18, -0.05]) and expressive communication scaled scores (β = -0.36 [-0.66, -0.05]). DLMs showed that higher prenatal air pollution exposure during mid and late pregnancy was inversely associated with motor, cognitive, and communication language scores. Conclusions Higher exposure to air pollutants during pregnancy, particularly in the mid and late prenatal periods, was inversely associated with scaled and composite motor, cognitive, and language scores at 2 years. These results indicate that prenatal ambient air pollution may negatively impact neurodevelopment in early life.

show abstract

“…Second, neurodevelopmental assessment was performed at six months CA, which might be too early to capture the subtle cognitive, language, and motor development differences. Results of the standardised tests showed very little variability, with the vast majority of children having scores considered as normal [ 20 , 21 ]. Additionally, Nordhov et al showed better cognitive performance at five years of age after being exposed to the MITP in the neonatal period [ 28 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The main outcome of this study concerned the six-month CA neurodevelopment of the preterm neonates, which was evaluated by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition (BSID-III) [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. This standardised test examines three domains of development: cognition, language (receptive and expressive communication), and motor skills (fine and gross motor).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Joint Observation in Neonatology and Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Preterm Infants at Six Months Corrected Age: Secondary Outcome Data from a Randomised Controlled Trial

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a standardised joint observation (JOIN) performed in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) on the neurodevelopment of preterm infants at six months corrected age (CA) compared with a preterm control group. In this monocentric interventional randomised controlled trial, we allocated 76 mothers and their preterm neonates to either JOIN, an early one-session intervention, or standard care during the NICU hospitalisation. The neurodevelopment of the preterm infants was assessed by standardised developmental tests at six months CA and compared between the intervention and the control groups. This randomised controlled trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02736136) in April 2016. Sixty-five infants underwent neurodevelopmental assessment at six months CA. There were no significant differences between the two groups in neurodevelopmental outcome measures. The JOIN intervention was not associated with significant improvement in neurodevelopment at six months CA in preterm infants.

show abstract

Which Bayley-III cut-off values should be used in different developmental levels?

Cited by 20 publications

References 19 publications

Validation of a touchscreen assessment tool to screen for cognitive delay at 24 months

Validation of a touchscreen assessment tool to screen for cognitive delay at 24 months

Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollution is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age

The Joint Observation in Neonatology and Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Preterm Infants at Six Months Corrected Age: Secondary Outcome Data from a Randomised Controlled Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About