2014
DOI: 10.3354/esep00147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which came first: the money or the rank?

Abstract: Global university rankings are provided by several organisations based on various criteria, most of which are, directly or indirectly, related to the wealth of the university. The main objective of this work was to examine the effect of money on rankings and vice versa. First, we examined the relationship between global university rankings and professors' salaries and found an asymptotic trend for all ranks of professors across the top 200 US universities, but no trend for the top Canadian universities. Second… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turner (2013) applies a new tool (Data Envelopment Analysis) to rankings and maintains that existing league tables do not take into account the cost of high-quality output, and are therefore not appropriate for the present period of adverse economic conditions where value-formoney rankings would certainly be more appropriate. Tsikliras et al (2014, this Theme Section) examine the relationship of global university rankings with professorial salaries and university income, and extrapolate the findings to various European universities. They conclude that funding, autonomy and support by the parent state of a university is important for its position in rankings, and discuss the fate of European universities in several countries in relation to the recent economic crisis.…”
Section: Issues Uncovered In This Theme Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turner (2013) applies a new tool (Data Envelopment Analysis) to rankings and maintains that existing league tables do not take into account the cost of high-quality output, and are therefore not appropriate for the present period of adverse economic conditions where value-formoney rankings would certainly be more appropriate. Tsikliras et al (2014, this Theme Section) examine the relationship of global university rankings with professorial salaries and university income, and extrapolate the findings to various European universities. They conclude that funding, autonomy and support by the parent state of a university is important for its position in rankings, and discuss the fate of European universities in several countries in relation to the recent economic crisis.…”
Section: Issues Uncovered In This Theme Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%