2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations?

Abstract: seminar for comments and criticism. The three anonymous referees and our editor, Simon Parker, gave us thorough and valuable comments, yet all remaining errors are our own. The authors' names are listed in alphabetical order for convenience. This was a fully collaborative effort.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
690
2
19

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 627 publications
(743 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
32
690
2
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, we do not detect a significant selection bias arising from the possibility that the factors determining the decision to become an entrepreneur might differ from those determining a new firm's start-up size. In other words, the outcome of our hypothesis testing with and without the inclusion of IMR is unchanged (Autio et al 2013;Estrin et al 2013). These extra results are not reported here, but all of them are available upon request.…”
Section: Further Analysesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, we do not detect a significant selection bias arising from the possibility that the factors determining the decision to become an entrepreneur might differ from those determining a new firm's start-up size. In other words, the outcome of our hypothesis testing with and without the inclusion of IMR is unchanged (Autio et al 2013;Estrin et al 2013). These extra results are not reported here, but all of them are available upon request.…”
Section: Further Analysesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Because we use two levels of analysis, data are analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling methods (Autio and Wennberg 2010;Autio et al 2013;Bosma and Sternberg 2014;Estrin and Mickiewicz 2011;Estrin et al 2013;Stuetzer et al 2014). We do not employ standard multivariate methods because they would preclude our assuming the independence of observations (Autio and Wennberg 2010;Hofmann et al 2000).…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, empirical evidence from cross-country analyses calls attention to institutional deficiencies on the country level (weak intellectual property rights protection and corruption, etc. ), which have a substantial negative impact on young firms' aspirations for growth and development [Estrin et al, 2013]. In the case of Russia, the significant inter-regional diversity of the business environment should be taken into account as even neighboring regions can differ greatly regarding the conditions for doing business [EBRD, 2013;Bruno et al, 2008;Iwasaki et al, 2016].…”
Section: Innovation In Companiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a discussion of a firm's aspirations for growth, scale of production and performance in transitioning economies without recourse to a study of institutional issues is liable to be incomplete [Aidis et al, 2008;Aidis, 2015;Welter, Smallbone, 2011;Smallbone et al, 2014;Krasniki, Desai, 2016;Wang, You, 2012]. Moreover, an institution-based study has become the main theoretical framework for business research on emerging economies and researchers tend to explore the interplay of formal and informal institutions at multiple levels of analysis [Thorsten et al, 2005;Meyer, Peng, 2005Estrin et al, 2013]. In our research, we are mostly interested how the institutional environment, assessed by the level of regional corruption, determines the perceptions of firms concerning optimal scale.…”
Section: Determinants and Patterns Of Sme Growth: The Russian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%