Which is the More Predictable Gender? Public Good Contribution and Personality

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract Personality questionnaires have been used and can be used to predict behavior in economic settings. Using two sets of state-of-the-art measures from personality psychology (the Big Six) and social psychology (Social Value Orientation), we find that the behavior of men is predictable in the first half of a public good contribution experiment, whereas that of women is not. This result agrees with the reinterpretation of Carol Gilligan's (1982) view that women are more sensitive to the context in which decisions are made. JEL Classification Codes: J16, C91, H41. Terms of use: Documents in

Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferences

“…These findings are consistent with the limited available evidence on the relationship between cooperativeness in economic experiments and the Big-Five dimension Agreeableness. For example, Agreeableness has been shown to be related to higher contributions in public goods games (Perugini et al, 2010), more cooperative choices in prisoner's dilemma games (Pothos et al, 2011) and higher donations in dictator games (Ben-Ner et al, 2004a). Furthermore, Bartling et al (2009) measure competitiveness in a sample of mothers of preschool children by confronting them with the choice between competing in a tournament or receiving a piece rate for a real effort task.…”

“…The relation between personality measures and other-regarding, prosocial behavior has been studied in public goods games(Fleming and Zizzo, 2011;Kurzban and Houser, 2001;Perugini et al, 2010;Skatova and Ferguson, 2011;Volk et al, 2011), dictator games(Ben-Ner et al, 2004a,b;Ben-Ner and Kramer, 2011), ultimatum games(Brandstätter and Königstein, 2001) and a series of distribution games(Bartling et al, 2009) Ashton et al (1998). andHirsh and Peterson (2009) study the correlation between personality measures and nonincentiviced measures for cooperation Boone et al (1999Boone et al ( , 2002.…”

A Theoretical and Experimental Appraisal of Five Risk Elicitation Methods

“…Following previous findings in the literature on lottery choices (Grossman et al, 2006) and public good games (Perugini et al, 2010), we also tested whether there are gender differences in the way questionnaire answers correlate with choices in incentivized tasks. In line with existing evidence, we find that when such differences are present, the correlation is usually stronger for males, while it is either not significant or much weaker for females.…”

The impact of social value orientation and risk attitudes on trust and reciprocity

“…Liebrand and van Run (1985) report ''no significant differences [between males and females] in the distribution of social motives" in their study of social motives and behavior in social dilemmas as well as in Liebrand (1984). Perugini, Tan, and Zizzo (2005) report that 55 percent of women are cooperators while 47% of men are cooperators. 19 A recent result reported by Aguiar, Branas-Garza, Cobo-Reyes, Jimenez, and Miller (2008) argues that women are expected to be more generous in a dictator game than men.…”